"Faith" is a whack-a-mole kinda term. Its definitions can change completely depending on the sentence its used in, as long as at the end if it you think you've made an argument for your beliefs.

I’ve been sitting in bed saying ab-ah ah-ba over and over and now i feel like a baby trying to say it’s first words

I honestly thought they already were. Granted, the daycare my kid is in has them, so I'm glad they didn't need a law to tell them to do it.

The ending of The Sixth Sense blew my mind!

Reagan proved that it’s also a defense.

Wow that’s really interesting I don’t think I’ve ever met anyone like that

Skyrim by Nintendo

I'd watch it

What a nut job. 5300?

Nude modeling. $15/hr for the art department in college. Easiest money ever.

[removed]

Fast: chip the foam back slighly below flush with the wall. Skim coat with spackle. Paint.

More: if you want to pull it apart, put a collar on it, kind of an escutcheon to cover the seam between wall and pipe.

Most: box it in. Build a frame, drywall that, and then never, ever see it again.

And kids getting eaten by sharks.

And then she be looking like a person on my 600 pound life

now i see. nice.

[removed]

Sorry, it was. I have edited the post :-)

[removed]

Lmfao. Nice job, let’s read the whole thing shall we?

> Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies:

> the data subject has given consent to the processing of his or her personal data for one or more specific purposes;

> processing is necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject is party or in order to take steps at the request of the data subject prior to entering into a contract;

> processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject; processing is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another natural person;

> processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller; processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party, except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection of personal data, in particular where the data subject is a child.

> Where point (a) of Article 6(1) applies, in relation to the offer of information society services directly to a child, the processing of the personal data of a child shall be lawful where the child is at least 16 years old.

> 2Where the child is below the age of 16 years, such processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that consent is given or authorised by the holder of parental responsibility over the child.

> 3Member States may provide by law for a lower age for those purposes provided that such lower age is not below 13 years.

Taken together, the company is only requires to get consent if 1) it processes the information, and 2) it is directly done for services direct to children.

So no mandatory consent or age verification across the board. You wanna try again bud?

Is that you Chad?

All the Smithsonian’s are close to each other. The air and space is a 5 min stroll across the mall from Natural History which is my personal fave. Also seconding Dan’s Cafe and Tune Inn as dives. Dan’s cafe is a real, real dive tho, so adjust expectations accordingly :-)

Where's the melanin?

Surprised they weren’t already required. This is just common sense.

I’ll tell you one pro athlete i didn’t approach, hockey goalie Eddie Belfour. It was at a funeral but one of my coworkers did. I thought that was inappropriate seeing as he mentioned hockey to him. Just no.

Yes and this is a constant incompatibility in my household.