Recent comments in /f/Futurology
Orc_ t1_jdm0hzk wrote
Reply to A recently submitted paper has demonstrated that Stable Diffusion can accurately reconstruct images from fMRI scans, effectively allowing it to "read people's minds". by iboughtarock
No. It can take those crappy images that actually "read" people's mind and make them look better.
"Stable Difussion can read your mind!!!" is the silliest thing I've read this month, congratulations.
SpiritualTwo5256 t1_jdm0e69 wrote
Reply to comment by grundar in There Is Still Plenty We Can Do to Slow Climate Change by nastratin
The problem with all of this is that the grid has to be transformed. To add in hundreds of millions of cars to the grid is going to break most of them. I expect that many of the grids will require voltage changes. Going from 120 in the states to 220-240. Otherwise we will have to adapt millions of transformers for higher loads. We will need billions of miles of new power lines and infrastructure to handle the new loads everywhere. And it all has to be done in the next 20 years.
Hot-Explanation6044 t1_jdm0a9n wrote
People sure don't understand jack about ideology
Ideology is not an erroneous way of thinking to be overcome by facts and logic rather it is a necessary byproduct of the fact that we are political beings
You cannot not be ideological. Thinking some technical advance can change human nature is ideological in itself.
And yeah "everything is ideological" is an ideological statement, produced by certain power relationship and historical paradigms. But at least it's an ideology conscious of itself which is already an advance compared to the idea that the human mind can access transcendental truths which has not been empircally proven yet and is widely discussed since philosophy exists
Antimutt t1_jdlyqvp wrote
Reply to comment by RamaSchneider in What happens if it turns out that being human is not that difficult to duplicate in a machine? What if we're just ... well ... copyable? by RamaSchneider
Or, perhaps, become the computer. If we can't crack strong AI, how about we copy a human cortex, train it to obey, market it. Odd idea? Here's the novel.
SpiritualTwo5256 t1_jdly45z wrote
Reply to comment by grundar in There Is Still Plenty We Can Do to Slow Climate Change by nastratin
No tipping points under 4C? ROFL 🤣 I swear some people haven’t taken a basic differential calculus class. Even a part of the time at higher levels means part of the effects happen. It doesn’t happen all at once when we reach the NumberC. Oh and the effect of carbon in the atmosphere is expected to last 200 years. So, anything even remotely close to 1-4C in the next 500 years is going to have an increasing feedback loop.
paperdahlia t1_jdlxx71 wrote
Reply to A recently submitted paper has demonstrated that Stable Diffusion can accurately reconstruct images from fMRI scans, effectively allowing it to "read people's minds". by iboughtarock
This idea seems scary but I'm hoping it means we can use it to help people with disabilities that prevent them from communicating. Ex. Dementia patients, nonverbal autistic folk, folks with ALS, coma patients, etc. And maybe we can even extend that to animals someday!
SpiritualTwo5256 t1_jdlxcsn wrote
Reply to comment by baddfingerz1968 in There Is Still Plenty We Can Do to Slow Climate Change by nastratin
I am with you! We are way too late to stop the feedback loops that will ultimately doom a substantial number of species, but we still have a chance to undo some of it if we are willing to not only end human carbon and methane emissions but invest in 7-15 trillion dollar last minute plans to cool the planet with a Texas sized solar shade between the sun and moon at the L1 Lagrange point.
Anything less than that and I don’t think our great grand kids will forgive us.
RamaSchneider OP t1_jdlx6u0 wrote
Reply to comment by Antimutt in What happens if it turns out that being human is not that difficult to duplicate in a machine? What if we're just ... well ... copyable? by RamaSchneider
That bit about "need to be transferable", I like that and it does indeed need to be there for a human to AI machine comparison. Thanks for mentioning that.
[Edit] Does that mean that humans are sub-computer?
whatistheformat t1_jdlx54p wrote
Reply to comment by Opposite-Quarter906 in How AI turned the ancient sport of Go upside down | CNN by yh5203
Well it can be either just like any game. the question is whether these tournaments are going to just pretend AI isn't a factor or have some kind of checks in place to ensure the humans aren't getting an AI assist. In lieu of physical presence- two in-person players could be searched and made to wear a special tournament uniform, or something- it could be impossible to prevent.
SpiritualTwo5256 t1_jdlx2bx wrote
There is tons we can do, if we had the right political, social and economic climate to do it in. Those are the things holding us back.
s1L3nCe_wb OP t1_jdlx0be wrote
Reply to comment by Mercurionio in Could AI be the key to overcoming ideological polarization? by s1L3nCe_wb
I'm not going to answer that question 😂
Antimutt t1_jdlwynw wrote
Reply to What happens if it turns out that being human is not that difficult to duplicate in a machine? What if we're just ... well ... copyable? by RamaSchneider
We wont rest. It's not enough to be copyable, we also need to be transferable, non-destructively. Then we leave this flesh behind.
GodzlIIa t1_jdlwpw7 wrote
Reply to comment by electric_ember in What happens if it turns out that being human is not that difficult to duplicate in a machine? What if we're just ... well ... copyable? by RamaSchneider
My experiences may differ but my consciousness is the same. We are both humans after all, if I had been born without eyes and everything else the same, I would be a much different person, but the same consciousness.
Mercurionio t1_jdlwkth wrote
Reply to comment by s1L3nCe_wb in Could AI be the key to overcoming ideological polarization? by s1L3nCe_wb
Then why did you create this post in the first place?
AI chat bots will be used in tandem with media to spread the narrative. The targeted narrative.
That's it.
solinvictus21 t1_jdlvwlp wrote
Reply to comment by jeremy-o in What happens if it turns out that being human is not that difficult to duplicate in a machine? What if we're just ... well ... copyable? by RamaSchneider
Our best AI models are already simulating trillions of synapses. The human brain has ~200 trillion. How much longer do you really think it’s going to be?
s1L3nCe_wb OP t1_jdlvojh wrote
Reply to comment by Mercurionio in Could AI be the key to overcoming ideological polarization? by s1L3nCe_wb
chatGPT is also very propagandistic.
electric_ember t1_jdlvilo wrote
Reply to comment by GodzlIIa in What happens if it turns out that being human is not that difficult to duplicate in a machine? What if we're just ... well ... copyable? by RamaSchneider
Your conscious experience is very different from the conscious experience of someone who is blind and deaf
albatros096 t1_jdlv7hh wrote
Reply to A recently submitted paper has demonstrated that Stable Diffusion can accurately reconstruct images from fMRI scans, effectively allowing it to "read people's minds". by iboughtarock
Eeee what am i reading minds when i analyze fmri data
a1b3c5d7 t1_jdlupb8 wrote
Reply to comment by baddfingerz1968 in There Is Still Plenty We Can Do to Slow Climate Change by nastratin
Personally i dont give a damn. I will be dead already when shit hit the fan.
Kaz_55 t1_jdlu0b6 wrote
Reply to comment by r2k-in-the-vortex in An ESA advisory committee has recommended Europe should independently develop its own space station when the ISS retires, and develop its own lunar base independently of NASA's Artemis plans. by lughnasadh
>Yes, reuse is absolutely mandatory if you plan to play on the level field with that. Reuse, or learn to build new orbital rocket each week in perpetuity on the cheap, good luck with that.
No it's not. Reuse itself puts a tight limit on your launch capacity, and SpaceX regularely expends boosters. Reuse is entirely optional, and speculating about a "a level playing field" without even knowing how reusability impacts SpaceX financially is pretty misleading.
Kiizmod0 t1_jdlt0ai wrote
Reply to comment by neuralbeans in What happens if it turns out that being human is not that difficult to duplicate in a machine? What if we're just ... well ... copyable? by RamaSchneider
You mean you want to ignore ✨ Soul✨?
Mercurionio t1_jdls9og wrote
Reply to comment by s1L3nCe_wb in Could AI be the key to overcoming ideological polarization? by s1L3nCe_wb
China already created AI tool for propaganda.
Just wait for powerful AI tool with targeted propaganda in EU / NA.
GodzlIIa t1_jdls560 wrote
Reply to comment by SomeoneSomewhere1984 in What happens if it turns out that being human is not that difficult to duplicate in a machine? What if we're just ... well ... copyable? by RamaSchneider
It's very possible. But weird to think about. I mean is there even different types of consciousness? Different ways to obtain consciousness, sure I can see that. But is the end result different?
r2k-in-the-vortex t1_jdlrzy8 wrote
Reply to comment by Kaz_55 in An ESA advisory committee has recommended Europe should independently develop its own space station when the ISS retires, and develop its own lunar base independently of NASA's Artemis plans. by lughnasadh
Falcon did 61 launches last year. No matter what you are fan of, you got to respect that tonnage and revenue. Starship is going to go a giant leap beyond that within few years. The only limit is finding enough payloads.
Yes, reuse is absolutely mandatory if you plan to play on the level field with that. Reuse, or learn to build new orbital rocket each week in perpetuity on the cheap, good luck with that.
SpiritualTwo5256 t1_jdm10vt wrote
Reply to comment by mwebster745 in There Is Still Plenty We Can Do to Slow Climate Change by nastratin
The next 7 to 14 generations are going to look back at us, our parents and our grand parents as either saviors or backwards evil idiots!