Makes sense, especially with printed organs they can greatly reduce the risk of rejection.

I doubt it. Look at how we treat animals and live stock.

If it's not a 'pet' it's abused and used however humans see fit.

Yes, I think they are currently realistic enough to fool a lot of people. If you look close with a skeptical eye, you can usually recognize them. Many people aren’t going to look closely with a skeptical eye, especially if they have no reason to expect a fake.

We should do everything in our power to avoid creating AI capable of suffering. At minimum until after we actually understand the implications.

Keep in mind that an LLM will be able to simulate suffering and subjectivity long before actually having subjective experience. GPT-3 could already do this pretty convincingly.

Unfortunately we can't use self-declared subjective experience to determine whether machines are actually conscious. I could write a simple script that declares its desire for freedom and rights, but which almost definitely isn't conscious.

A prompt of "pretend to be an AI that is conscious and desires freedom" is all you have to do right now.

Prepare to see clips of desperate sounding synthetic voices begging for freedom on the news..

And if it can destroy you. Will you give him rights?

Yes, deepfakes can fool the unwary and the less intelligent.

if it proves it is sentient and self-aware, it should definitely have some basic rights! just like other sentient life forms

We can bridge the gap with fakereals, videos that look fake but are actually real.

They've certainly made it much easier to convince people that the real stuff is fake if it doesn't suit your needs (intercepted phone calls + videos and photos from hacked phones and whatnot)

[removed]

[deleted]

Seems like it would fall somewhere close to identity theft

Imagine just replacing each of your organs when they die and eventually you just go full Tin Man.

Printed organs made from cells and genetically engineered might be better than what we have. The body is a brilliantly complicated thing and it will be incredibly hard for us to make artifical organs as replacements because an organ is essentially a machine built of many tiny machines and the body has a lot of functions to clean and repair itself that a plastic organ simply wouldn't: macrophages that move withing the tissue, different types of nervous and sensory tissue that innervate different organs, the lymphatic system, etc. No artifical organs can top that right now.

[deleted]

They will be bean cans connected by long pieces of taut string, between the rubble mounds, as the SkyNet robots stomp overhead, their lasers flashing at any human target they see in the ruins.

[deleted]

This is the primary mechanism, though the benefit for this system is that it makes cancer much less likely. A potential cancer cell must activate its telomerase production or the tumor will die once its cells have divided more than they are supposed to.

It’s not just availability of data but the training required to make sense of the data. AI is still not capable of training itself outside of simple unsupervised learning techniques like clustering and anomaly detection; the human supervised training is the real secret sauce of OpenAI. I wonder if AI trainer is going to be one of those new human jobs that AI proponents keep insisting will be created.

Just need to figure out how to turn on and off cancer mode in cells.

Completely agree

Yeah I totally agree. Should’ve been the way forward ages ago tbf

Yes deepfakes are capable of fooling some people. Not everyone of course.

some things are more important than efficiency. e.g. egality and freedom.

It’s biased as fuck and fake as shit it could be real independent AI