Recent comments in /f/Futurology
[deleted] t1_je48t5l wrote
Reply to Head-word device can now help paralyzed individuals control a mobile robot by ChirperChiara
[removed]
Rogermcfarley t1_je48rld wrote
Reply to comment by Mercurionio in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
It's early days with AI I don't know how much will be paywalled. However if it's part of your job then your workplace will pay for it. If you're learning then there will be student access. It is just a tool and there's much hype about it. I don't see any immediate threat that humans won't overcome and adapt to. The progress is startling but that's where we've got a little tripped up. I don't as of yet associate fear with AI just more possibilities. It really depends if powerful people get to gatekeep the power of future AI. That's something we don't yet know.
Mercurionio t1_je48pn9 wrote
Reply to comment by No-Wallaby-5568 in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
It will be improved towards what is needed.
The question is not about "I lost my job, where to go". The question is to plan ahead for a year at least.
Frankly, AI already did kill our future. We can't plan for it, we can't prepare for it, we don't what will happen tomorrow. It's like knowing the date of your death, but from the opposite angle. The same frustration and fear.
Mercurionio t1_je48h14 wrote
Reply to comment by Rogermcfarley in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
And if you don't have access to it, what those should do?
MadDocsDuck t1_je47weo wrote
Reply to comment by thedailybeast in This Bacteria Can Turn Today’s CO2 Into Tomorrow’s Biodegradable Plastic by thedailybeast
Do you know what the volumetric consumption rate is (i.e. CO2/Liter of culture/h)? That is really the decissive factor in such endeavours. If I remember correctly, past studies haven't been able to surpass the capture rate of a regular tree. That is still worth investigating because you can get better end products from the capture but you basically compete against planting trees and turning them into something else through sugar fermentation.
[deleted] t1_je47p4t wrote
[removed]
WYCoCoCo t1_je47imo wrote
Reply to Single parent homes are the result of power grab by the neoliberal technocracy due the crossing of the singularity. by practical_ussy
You’re a bad writer. Whatever the asinine message you’re trying to convey is made so much worse by mixing words and syntax into a completely awful dog’s dinner of a diatribe. Please apologize to my eyeballs and brain for assaulting them.
Mercurionio t1_je46ts5 wrote
Reply to comment by Cerulean_IsFancyBlue in Would a corporation realistically release an AGI to the public? by Shiningc
AGI is a hardware, that is not chained with awaiting for the prompt.
Imagine a loop "do... While...". Where "While" is limited by energy consumption.
Brutzelmeister t1_je46sbc wrote
The rich will make themselves enough exceptions that they won`t get hit too much by that. Supercars, yachts and so on....
B-Town-MusicMan t1_je46q7l wrote
Mercurionio t1_je46ed5 wrote
No.
They will keep it to themselves as long as possible.
[deleted] t1_je45urf wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je45ohk wrote
Reply to comment by bschofield in What science and technology should be here already (2023) but isn’t? by InfinityScientist
[removed]
ML4Bratwurst t1_je44w4o wrote
Reply to comment by colonize_mars2023 in New cars sold in EU must be zero-emission from 2035 by Vucea
EVs are already cheaper and are still getting cheaper. Whole combustion cars get bigger and more expensive
Aggravating_Impact97 t1_je44pir wrote
Still waiting on my back to the future style hover board. Not that fake shit y’all are trying by to call a hover board.
Norseviking4 t1_je44g3a wrote
People hate this argument usually, but i see a role for government here. If a company makes a true agi, that company will be visited by the govt real fast. (Im in Scandinavia, so my govt doing this is not very scary)
Now, depending on the govt who do the visiting this may or may not be a good thing. But there is atleast a chance government regulation will lead to better outcomes than Microsoft taking over the world.
AdTypical6494 t1_je43y1p wrote
Reply to comment by B-Town-MusicMan in Former Google engineer predicts humans will achieve immortality within eight years by dustofoblivion123
he sells keyboards? 🤔
Norseviking4 t1_je43x4t wrote
I expected full selfdriving, more clean energy, and advanced home robots by now.
I did not expect microsoft claiming their ai showing hints of agi.
Its a wild ride thats for sure
Changleen t1_je438dd wrote
Reply to The Swiss hypersonic hydrogen jet aiming to fly between Europe and Australia in 4 hours by mancinedinburgh
Green hydrogen is being invested in incredibly heavily around the world at the moment. Something like 26 billion USD of new investment was announced in 2022 alone. Hydrogen is a great energy carrier, and we can use it in a lot of industrial processes too. When you have a green energy grid with a lot of solar and wind, whenever there is oversupply you shunt this power into making green hydrogen. This actually has positive market effects for producers and consumers alike. Then when the wind stops blowing you use your fuel cell to make electricity. This part is pretty damn efficient.
The major part of the cost to make green hydrogen is the cost of electricity, and if you can engineer or take advantage of situations where electricity is cheap then it’s a great way to store energy that can last for years vs. batteries that slowly loose charge in weeks. Once you can make it for less than US$1 per kg, it becomes more attractive than diesel. The US DOE is investing $$ in their 1:1:1 challenge to get the average cost of green hydrogen down to less than $1 for 1 kilo in 1 decade. They may well succeed too.
If this happens there’s a tonne of cool stuff that might happen, not just cars and planes, bit alternative methods of making both concrete and steel which both happen to be 8% each of global CO2 output. Greening these processes would be a massive deal for our collective carbon footprint let alone the fun we could have with really long range lightweight cars and planes.
Villad_rock t1_je431ar wrote
Reply to comment by Western_Cow_3914 in Would a corporation realistically release an AGI to the public? by Shiningc
An agi could them completely self sufficient, they won’t need any money.
[deleted] t1_je42w3l wrote
[removed]
Villad_rock t1_je42ukz wrote
Reply to comment by imakenosensetopeople in Would a corporation realistically release an AGI to the public? by Shiningc
An agi could do everything a human can which means no human would earn money anymore.
Changleen t1_je42ap9 wrote
Reply to comment by Regnasam in The Swiss hypersonic hydrogen jet aiming to fly between Europe and Australia in 4 hours by mancinedinburgh
I’m not discounting nuclear at all, I particularly think these small modular reactors look amazing, and while we’re still talking fission rather than future fusion (let’s go!) then these molten salt reactor designs look great. They’re basically impossible to meltdown. Essentially the reaction situation is hard to maintain and any failure results in the reaction stopping rather than going critical. Good stuff. However it still comes with the problem of long (loooonnnnnggg) lasting radioactive waste. I can’t wait for fusion to get going.
megapillowcase t1_je416bo wrote
Reply to Former Google engineer predicts humans will achieve immortality within eight years by dustofoblivion123
Life is only meaningful because there is an end. I’ll take my cool 80 years.
time_lordy_lord t1_je4959c wrote
Reply to What science and technology should be here already (2023) but isn’t? by InfinityScientist
I think (but don't know for sure) widespread solar electricity grids should already be here. Traditional means should vice versa with solar panels in terms of energy production