Recent comments in /f/Futurology
RamaSchneider t1_je4ic48 wrote
I think that social media as we understand it today is going to disappear. Curating on a personal or system wide level is going to be made impossible by the massive amount of new material that will generated daily.
There will be social media like sites that give the appearance of what we are comfortable with right now, but those sites will be closed systems meant to provide a place with a suitable and predictable set of protections (or lack of).
SeaElephant8890 t1_je4i188 wrote
Kinda wish there was a What's App, Signal or other service based on phone number registration.
I'd consider being more social if your phone number must be in my actual contacts list with the ability to join groups of interest to broaden your network.
Facebook, Instagram and Twitter have far too much noise to make them useful as an actual social media platform for me.
anima99 t1_je4i0wj wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What will the future of social media look like? by PhyllisBentley
I think people have collectively given up on data security. Like, we joke about it, especially with the "My FBI agent" memes. We have all these terms and conditions that we don't read, and they may have a line or two that says "we can do whatever we want with your data if you agree."
There's this book I read about a future where private corporations ruled over governments. The divide was more on what employees of said corporations can have and do vs the perks of the other corporations. It was a big loyalty game.
We might have that soon, what with how we worship brands and the way they validate us socially.
[deleted] OP t1_je4hv4s wrote
Reply to Dude, Where’s My Future? by [deleted]
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je4hfqb wrote
Reply to comment by anima99 in What will the future of social media look like? by PhyllisBentley
[removed]
Plate_Of_Soup t1_je4hb69 wrote
Reply to comment by pythagorean_cultist in What science and technology should be here already (2023) but isn’t? by InfinityScientist
I'd add to this list Space Elevators. We have the geostationary orbit satellites, just increase their mass somewhat, and we can hook up a cable to visit the stars
AeternusDoleo t1_je4ha90 wrote
Reply to comment by Parafault in How will we feed 10 billion people by 2050? Ask the Netherlands. by filosoful
Fertilizer, yes ('though limited, as the natural river delta and drained peat bogs that make up the bulk of our nation tend to be fertile ground). Pesticides not so much.
Fertilizer production (from livestock industries), use and the nitrate emissions it causes are a major source of controversy in our nation at the moment.
[deleted] t1_je4h9lt wrote
[removed]
anima99 t1_je4h93d wrote
When it comes to the future of anything about people, we can always look to China.
In China, we have the social credit points system. We meme it, but it may coming to us all in the next decade, but it would be more on "since you use [app], you can avail of [benefits]."
The metric of how good the perks are will rely on how valuable your account is + how much money you generate the app.
Those likes, shares, reacts, follows will be part of how they compute your social media value. The clout chasing will now be even greater than ever, because it's literally affecting your quality of life.
We'll have stores where "only those with 1 million+ followers are allowed" or VIP access that restrict entrance to those with a certain "social media level."
We might even push it further and have "Team [app1]" vs "Team [app2]" kinds of social discrimination.
Rogermcfarley t1_je4gzn0 wrote
Reply to comment by Mercurionio in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
That's catastrophic thinking though. You are predicting something that you will make come true and the key word is you. I can't make promises for everyone but you already set your fate by your thinking. You need to be responsible for your future wherever possible. Your belief is what will ultimately hold you back or set you free.
randomevenings t1_je4go1b wrote
Reply to comment by randomevenings in New cars sold in EU must be zero-emission from 2035 by Vucea
However it appears that the electrification of cars was always going to be the start of the electrification of everything else so this will drive the electrification infrastructure forward and battery technology forward that will allow the kinds of innovations that will lead to being able to offset a lot of that carbon would be released by heavy shipping and airliners.
I didn't know things were much better on the infrastructure front in Europe. I was always appreciative to Ellen musk for giving away the supercharger adapter patent because it did go on way to standardizing a type of socket or at least allowing for the compatibility of several different types so that there's not this walled garden so to speak and that's what we need because right now you could fuel up your car and any gas station well that should be essentially the same situation when it comes to the electrification of cars and it could have very well went the other way where you got Apple with the lightning cable and there was the juggling of USB standards for a while with the other phones.
Xeroque_Holmes t1_je4gnw5 wrote
Reply to The Swiss hypersonic hydrogen jet aiming to fly between Europe and Australia in 4 hours by mancinedinburgh
Not gonna happen any time soon. Commercially viable supersonic, let alone hypersonic flight is a huge endeavor in itself, that probably won't be solved any time soon and plenty of companies have failed. If anything planes have been getting slower for better fuel efficiency.
And hydrogen airplanes is another massive topic in itself that even industry giants as Airbus are having trouble tackling.
Now, combining both problems into one is just insane.
randomevenings t1_je4glha wrote
Reply to comment by warplants in New cars sold in EU must be zero-emission from 2035 by Vucea
Cars are very small percentage of the carbon released into the atmosphere One round trip of a container ship releases as much carbon in the atmosphere as all the cars in the United States for an entire year
Xeroque_Holmes t1_je4gfa6 wrote
Reply to comment by Changleen in The Swiss hypersonic hydrogen jet aiming to fly between Europe and Australia in 4 hours by mancinedinburgh
> It doesn’t ‘need’ to be stored at high pressure at all.
Just to circle back to the original topic, in airplanes it does. Otherwise you won't have very much of it.
Xeroque_Holmes t1_je4gazv wrote
Reply to comment by wheelontour in The Swiss hypersonic hydrogen jet aiming to fly between Europe and Australia in 4 hours by mancinedinburgh
Plus there's a lot of inefficiency in generating, transporting and storing hydrogen.
KungFuHamster t1_je4gaon wrote
Reply to comment by koliamparta in Would a corporation realistically release an AGI to the public? by Shiningc
Have you tried being a writer? You really like to make shit up out of nothing.
[deleted] t1_je4fy8s wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je4f9hn wrote
[removed]
comradelucyford t1_je4e1e3 wrote
Reply to comment by HongoMushroomMan in Does ChatGPT have a sense of humor? by Tripwir62
It is my understanding that Bing Chat uses a customized version of gpt 4. It has obvious limitations but even it is scarily useful. I have it give me examples of how to use different APIs frequently and more often than not it is correct and more concise than anything I find with traditional searching.
​
Not the same as full GPT 4 and doesn't mitigate the concern of gating access to such a revolutionary technology but at least it is something for anyone out there who may be feeling left behind.
[deleted] t1_je4dwor wrote
Reply to Head-word device can now help paralyzed individuals control a mobile robot by ChirperChiara
[removed]
Gauth1erN t1_je4d0t3 wrote
Reply to comment by Weareallgoo in The Swiss hypersonic hydrogen jet aiming to fly between Europe and Australia in 4 hours by mancinedinburgh
Hydrogen is a rocket propellant...
Tnuvu t1_je4cvph wrote
Reply to Former Google engineer predicts humans will achieve immortality within eight years by dustofoblivion123
Perhaps rich top 1% humans, somehow doubt we'll ever reach the utopian Star Trek level of unity given we can't even share food and medicine with all the people on the planet today.
Let's not even mention the "you must respect the rules we impose, but we don't have to cause we have money" approach the wef has on basically anything
Shiningc OP t1_je4cm8q wrote
Reply to comment by the_new_standard in Would a corporation realistically release an AGI to the public? by Shiningc
You believed the “news” aka corporate PR?
Mercurionio t1_je4clfy wrote
Reply to comment by Rogermcfarley in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
I'm the embodiment of what will happen.
Some will have access to it and will be able to adapt somehow. Others won't and, basically, will die. Like me.
Finally, there will be those, who control the access. Guess what they will have.
theWunderknabe t1_je4idfx wrote
Reply to comment by Rdg1961 in What science and technology should be here already (2023) but isn’t? by InfinityScientist
The thing with fossil fuels is - they are pretty great. Easy to handle, not very dangerous - extremely energy dense. 1 liter of Diesel contains 50x the energy of LiPo batteries.
Even though electric motors are over 90% efficent (and combustion engines only 30% or so) - this massive advantage of energy density will prohibit larger electric planes or ships for many years.