Recent comments in /f/Futurology
koliamparta t1_je778lg wrote
Reply to comment by KungFuHamster in Would a corporation realistically release an AGI to the public? by Shiningc
Yes, tell me of a scenario where the decision to not release it to the public stops any of the above entities from developing it.
theWunderknabe t1_je76660 wrote
Reply to comment by NoRich4088 in What science and technology should be here already (2023) but isn’t? by InfinityScientist
I would say the active camouflage would be the least useful thing among this list. Developing space technologies on such a scale is sure to give a return on terrestial life, creating living space on or beneath the ocean has obvious advantages, as have solar and wind power clusters in appropiate locations.
Perhaps the holodeck thing is actually the least useful, but even that is creating massive technological progress from the sub-technologies required to get there.
TreeHawkFeather t1_je75bc5 wrote
Reply to Former Google engineer predicts humans will achieve immortality within eight years by dustofoblivion123
100% doubt, but I can't imagine the madness that would bring.
AppearanceHeavy6724 t1_je74enf wrote
Reply to comment by cursedbones in Is capitalism REALLY going to disappear? by Phoenix5869
Although I myself dislike Capitalism and grew up myself in USSR, and agree that USSR did achieve quite a bit of successes in a short period of time, the same can be said about Asian "miracles" of 1970s and 1980s. USSR has never been a Socialist country, the whole purpose of its existence was to sustain the Russian Empire. USSR was Russian Empire, with different decorations,some sprinkles of ideology and not much more to it. All the other Asian "socialist" countries countries you brought are just good old corrupt kingdoms of their leader, or in case of China an Empire in disguise.
artix111 t1_je73poa wrote
Reply to comment by OriginalCompetitive in What will the future of social media look like? by PhyllisBentley
People won’t write long messages anymore after they get used to how accessible the most complex of information will be. It will get that good.
Galactus_Jones762 OP t1_je71t64 wrote
Reply to comment by phine-phurniture in Unmasking Fear and Greed: The Real Reason We Disagree About the Future by Galactus_Jones762
You’re big into Nietzsche, sounds like.
[deleted] t1_je71qs6 wrote
Reply to comment by cursedbones in Is capitalism REALLY going to disappear? by Phoenix5869
[deleted]
phine-phurniture t1_je71nyk wrote
Reply to comment by Galactus_Jones762 in Unmasking Fear and Greed: The Real Reason We Disagree About the Future by Galactus_Jones762
Massive futility..... :)
Pessimism in outlook MUST be accompanied with optimism of the will..
FuturologyBot t1_je6ze51 wrote
Reply to Bill Gates: The rules of the road are about to change. I believe we’ll reach a tipping point with autonomous vehicles within the next decade. by Vucea
The following submission statement was provided by /u/Vucea:
>I recently had the opportunity to ride in a car made by the British company Wayve, which has a fairly novel approach to self-driving vehicles.
>While a lot of AVs can only navigate on streets that have been loaded into their system, the Wayve vehicle operates more like a person.
Link to video
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/12608m1/bill_gates_the_rules_of_the_road_are_about_to/je6ubfk/
dreamogorgon t1_je6wpc2 wrote
If you want this list to be "well fleshed out" you should give some reasoning behind each suggestion.
mi2h_N0t-r34l_ t1_je6wivc wrote
Correct but some people are allergic to scalpels... How quickly a body could transition from one material to another is a valuable quandary to wade through and whether the body would adjust to the new reality without issue is another entirely; if aging were not a problem, old men would out-compete young men in any dating pool as they would quickly recover from hormone deficiency and production issues...
mi2h_N0t-r34l_ t1_je6vxws wrote
Reply to Algae Farms for Carbon Capture by Thunder_Burt
Can I put shrimp in the tanks and place the concept on my roof, that I may enjoy sushi on a monthly basis?
Would go great with my quail-egg sandwiches...
Galactus_Jones762 OP t1_je6v4b0 wrote
Reply to comment by phine-phurniture in Unmasking Fear and Greed: The Real Reason We Disagree About the Future by Galactus_Jones762
Good points. Our primitive aspects are real. My hope is to get them out in the open to be examined. Just as man has always struggled, man also shows consistent capacity to slowly improve morally. It doesn’t happen by itself. It happens thru ideas and leadership that grow into movements that turn into change. There have always been the cynics and there have always been the idealists. There is massive futility in both, but less so for the idealists and dreamers, who rightfully own all the positive changes that have occurred in history, and when you add them up, you must admit there are MANY. Today’s idealists are no different. Most of us are spitting in the wind, but it is the combined efforts of millions that lead to the few whose names are associated with change. Which team are you on: that’s the only remaining question.
Your point about the mechanics of rhetoric and confirmation bias is astute. Articulating the problem is half of finding a solution, so you’re doing good work. Thank you.
phine-phurniture t1_je6ubr0 wrote
Reply to comment by Galactus_Jones762 in Unmasking Fear and Greed: The Real Reason We Disagree About the Future by Galactus_Jones762
Homo Economicas... Unfortunately issue fatigue has become the rule any compelling argument ends up attached to someone who tells us what we want to hear not what we need to hear.... they cant get elected otherwise.
I believe that this ironically the reason we have extremism the dialectic is out of whack with real world needs..
Dont forget "the will to power" and our primitive aspects.
Vucea OP t1_je6ubfk wrote
Reply to Bill Gates: The rules of the road are about to change. I believe we’ll reach a tipping point with autonomous vehicles within the next decade. by Vucea
>I recently had the opportunity to ride in a car made by the British company Wayve, which has a fairly novel approach to self-driving vehicles.
>While a lot of AVs can only navigate on streets that have been loaded into their system, the Wayve vehicle operates more like a person.
Link to video
Fawqueue t1_je6tmgq wrote
There was an episode of Black Mirror that I believed summed this up quite nicely. It's going to suck.
Jindujun t1_je6tdnk wrote
Reply to comment by Johns-schlong in This Bacteria Can Turn Today’s CO2 Into Tomorrow’s Biodegradable Plastic by thedailybeast
Ideally yes!
You need massive amounts of air moving through the solution to the CO2 problem and that is the issue.
Same thing with all these "water from air" things that pop up time and time again. Sure air contains both water and CO2, but the concentration at any give point is minimal so you need massive amounts of air moving through the system at all time for there to be any CO2 to scrub from the air which is the problem.
burghguy3 t1_je6sdy6 wrote
Reply to Is capitalism REALLY going to disappear? by Phoenix5869
The Industrial Revolution and automated production lines didn’t stop capitalism. It just adapted. I see it doing the same here.
Fivenearhere t1_je6rggp wrote
Reply to Former Google engineer predicts humans will achieve immortality within eight years by dustofoblivion123
Immortality is a hard thing to achieve when you involve statistics.
Rdg1961 t1_je6q2je wrote
Reply to comment by ktElwood in What science and technology should be here already (2023) but isn’t? by InfinityScientist
Good grief
azuriasia t1_je6pww9 wrote
Reply to comment by johnkfo in Are there AI theorists/philosophers who have already thought out sensible rules for how to best regulate AI development? by dryuhyr
Let those countries implode under the weight of 80% unemployment.
johnkfo t1_je6plrq wrote
Reply to comment by azuriasia in Are there AI theorists/philosophers who have already thought out sensible rules for how to best regulate AI development? by dryuhyr
might as well just ban it then, which isn't going to happen. or AI developers will move to countries with low or no tax and your country will become irrelevant in terms of economy and technological advancement
Futurology-ModTeam t1_je6pjgy wrote
Rule 2 - Submissions must be futurology related or future focused.
johnkfo t1_je6pdip wrote
kind of ironic you mention matrix lore but then go on to list the same kind of rules and treatment of robots that led to humans being annihilated by robots in the first place lmao
MrZwink t1_je77lw1 wrote
Reply to comment by klaveruhh in How will we feed 10 billion people by 2050? Ask the Netherlands. by filosoful
That is mostly caused by the meat industry though.