Recent comments in /f/Futurology

Numai_theOnlyOne t1_jeb9lah wrote

Tbh can we separate human learning with AI learning?

A human is a biological imperfect being that require time and repetition to learn.

AI needs just a large pool of data and can the same as millions of humans in a fracture of the time required.

I think that's not the same learning, and a thing that honestly should be questioned, after all our content was created with humans in mind and not meant to been used for ai.

5

yeah_i_am_new_here OP t1_jeb94fc wrote

I agree, I'm just not convinced of any evidence that the reasoning that went into your response is integral to the validity of the response itself. So basically, my argument is that whether or not LLMs can reason isn't really that important, because the output is compelling either way. I'd like to believe that there's some magic in our capability to reason that makes the world run a little better, but I just don't know

−1

Numai_theOnlyOne t1_jeb91dq wrote

Yeah and it makes sense as human but I can see this being an issue with AI and how fast it can learn.

After all suddenly whatever I posted anywhere is used to generate revenue which was formerly targeted towards people for free to get response for free. AI though usually requires you to pay for it. So why shouldn't the pay me to use my data? Sure maybe there is someone that made money with my response, and I might buy any of there stuff that's fine because it was not only because of my input unlike AI which only works because of the data. Same with artists. They were posting stuff for free not to be used for free but to present their art and land a job. You can't also not just rip an image from the internet and use it in a commercial because "it was freely available on the internet".

2

rdoolan3 t1_jeb7s1k wrote

Isn't increasing immigration parasitic on the donor countries though that experience a brain drain? Like the argument I hear is oh we can get doctors from India and other places, but those countries need their medical staff too. I'm pro immigrant like if people need to move that's their choice I just don't think of it as a solution to some of the world's problems

4

ninjadude93 t1_jeb7jjw wrote

I see everyone saying something along the lines of humans communicate/think in the same way chatgpt/NNs comes up with blocks of text but thats just not true. Chatgpt is stochastic, you can get two different outputs from the same simple input. When I'm writing this reply to you I'm not just picking the most likely string of words I'm sitting here considering each word I want to say. As far as I know LLMs by design are incapable of this kind of reasoning

5

Plastic_Part_5138 t1_jeb4wbl wrote

It's genetics, nutrition and doing things that optimise growth hormone that effect it. Taller parents will have taller kids generally. Countries that eat alot of dairy like Netherlands, Montenegro, Minnesota in US - tend to be taller. Countries like China increased height by 2-3 inches in school districts with mandatory milk programmes. milk increases Insulin like Growth Factor and has a very slow digesting protein (casein).

In the Netherlands they found that immigrants from Moroco and China had children that grew to the average height of the country probably by eating more similary to the Dutch.

During excercise and sleep growth hormone is released, it is reccomended that teens get 9 hours.

2