Recent comments in /f/Pennsylvania
sevenicecubes t1_je37xw7 wrote
Just please stay out of the passing lane unless you are actively passing thanks love you
godofleet t1_je36ec4 wrote
Reply to comment by TheJohnMega in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
yeah, he gets paid to put as many people as possible into for-profit prisons... :/
Aggravating_Foot_528 t1_je35zmo wrote
Reply to comment by pinkpolo in Looking to visit PA caves-which one is your favorite? by pinkpolo
Mammoth is awesome. Probably need advance tickets.
Braggolach t1_je35k5k wrote
Reply to comment by victorix58 in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
Which God. And which people. Pretty sure the Abrahamic God delights in death.
victorix58 OP t1_je3547q wrote
Reply to comment by Braggolach in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
I'm pretty sure God thinks we should have laws to deter drunk drivers from killing people.
bk1285 t1_je34dnc wrote
Reply to comment by Low-Public-9948 in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
Especially as someone who was arrested for a DUI for thc may also be required to have the ignition interlock system installed in their vehicle and will have to pay all the fees for that when they are being tested for a substance they have never been found guilty to have used while driving
Braggolach t1_je346r6 wrote
Reply to comment by victorix58 in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
In order for there to be a tort there has to be a harm. Let God decide
annon103014 t1_je33kvs wrote
Reply to comment by jday1959 in A Pennsylvania chocolate factory explosion has killed 7 people by FolsgaardSE
From what I've heard/read it was a gas leak.
Employees smelled gas. Called it into the gas company. No one showed up.
doransignal t1_je32wuc wrote
Reply to comment by Exodys03 in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
If a chem major could make an accurate test for the short term they would become a multi millionaire overnight.
Head-Tangerine-9131 t1_je32k44 wrote
Penns Cave
Exodys03 t1_je31uqo wrote
Kudos. The existing law can saddle people with a life altering DUI solely because testing is able to detect THC far longer than alcohol. If politicians or police were being charged with DUI for the drinks they had a month ago, the law would be changed before tomorrow.
victorix58 OP t1_je316ug wrote
Reply to comment by Low-Public-9948 in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
Alcohol effects people differently too though. If you're taking that tack, you would be suggesting get rid of the blood alcohol content laws as well. They are also generalizations based upon non-specific data.
I mean, we could do that, but it doesn't have as great of a logic or fairness justification. And I personally do not know that I would want to.
SeptasLate t1_je30xm1 wrote
Reply to comment by WingedChimera in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
Are you sure youre not mixing up the research that focused on CBD? It seems their research conflicts with your point.
I don't think thr Colorado Department of Transportation would make a statement like "There are many misconceptions about marijuana use, including rumors that it can’t impair your ability to drive or that it can actually make you a safer driver. Several scientific studies indicate that this is false" if their scientific studies said otherwise. https://www.codot.gov/safety/impaired-driving/druggeddriving/data
[deleted] t1_je2z72j wrote
Reply to comment by WingedChimera in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
[deleted]
Low-Public-9948 t1_je2z5zx wrote
Reply to comment by victorix58 in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
How to you gage what that level is though? THC effects people differently.
How do you prevent it from being the money-making machine that alcohol-related DUI’s has become?
teddythe3rd t1_je2yvbb wrote
Reply to Here’s what we know about Paul Martino's involvement in this year's school board races by Open_Veins_8
Is this the same guy who was scammed trying to make a movie on the nba ref scandal?
SeptasLate t1_je2yrf4 wrote
Reply to comment by victorix58 in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
That makes sense. Thanks for sharing the information
victorix58 OP t1_je2yiaw wrote
Reply to comment by SeptasLate in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
> Does this require a blood test?
Yes. It is pretty standard to do blood tests in both alcohol and drug DUIs.
Alcohol also has the option, which isn't available for drug, to do a more reliable breath test on a machine that can be maintained at the police station. The breathalyzers or "preliminary breath tests" that they have on the side of the road are not admissible at trial and do not detect drugs, so they are just used as a guidepost on whether there is enough reason to send it for a more reliable test.
LindaKParks t1_je2y4j2 wrote
Reply to The 3 Mile Island nuclear power station near Harrisburg, PA, suffers a partial meltdown in 1979, due to coolant leakage. Though there were no casualties, the accident gave way to more stringent safety standards, and also a slowdown in construction of reactors. by LoneWolfInCyberia
I was teaching in a school that was told to prepare to shelter people from Harrisburg if they need to evacuate the area. Scary time.
Asikar_Tehjan t1_je2xu2k wrote
Reply to comment by SoulCartell117 in Giant in its earlier days before it became a much larger force in Pennsylvania's supermarket scene. 1984 Harrisburg Patriot-News photo of its Camp Hill location featured on the Facebook page Remembering Retail. by 7nationarmy
Well, that pic was only like four years after the oil crisis of 1979. So big gas guzzling cars/trucks probably weren't on everyone's list of desirable vehicles.
WingedChimera t1_je2xqdb wrote
Reply to comment by SeptasLate in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
Colorado Department of Transportation did a study on the effects of cannabis on driving and found the standard of deviation was higher than the impairment.
Folks out here doing studies with government money proving smoking reasonable amounts of pot doesn’t impair driving and yet folks still want to listen to 89 years of propaganda.
Few-Chance118 t1_je2xa7d wrote
Reply to Giant in its earlier days before it became a much larger force in Pennsylvania's supermarket scene. 1984 Harrisburg Patriot-News photo of its Camp Hill location featured on the Facebook page Remembering Retail. by 7nationarmy
In all these years the only thing that's really changed is the lettering... every giant I've seen still uses that green roof aesthetic all along its outer walking space
SeptasLate t1_je2vxc7 wrote
Reply to comment by victorix58 in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
Yeah and I agree with that, but the article mentions NJ as an alternative despite its system currently under review by their state courts.
I suppose what I was trying to say is that I commend that rep for pushing to change the laws but I'm confused why they didn't mention what the effective/acceptable alternative would be which appears to be raising the baseline for the in the system. Does this require a blood test?
victorix58 OP t1_je2urne wrote
Reply to comment by SeptasLate in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
Edit: Please do not downvote u/SeptasLate for this legitimate concern.
Nothing suggests that there wouldn't be deterrents in place for impaired driving. I'm a criminal defense lawyer; allow me to explain for those who might not know.
Two types of DUI laws exist in PA, each with two sub-varieties. Those are alcohol-based DUI laws and drug based DUI laws.
Alcohol is subdivided into alcohol impairment DUIs and having a certain level of alcohol in your blood. You can be prosecuted in either circumstance.
Drug is differently subdivided into drug impairment and having ANY level of an illegal, non-prescription drug in your blood. Medical marijuana is not by prescription, only legally authorized, and so can still be prosecuted for any level.
All we have to do to make it fair, is to change marijuana from the ANY level DUI into a certain high level of THC which has been shown by study to cause impairment (like alcohol does). Right now, it's unfair because we KNOW it doesn't impair you at certain levels and yet it is still against the law and you WILL be prosecuted regardless of your lack of impairment.
victorix58 OP t1_je38n9o wrote
Reply to comment by Braggolach in Lawmaker takes drug test to prove Pennsylvania DUI laws unfair by victorix58
I feel like we've gotten a little off subject. lol