Recent comments in /f/Pennsylvania

B0MBOY t1_je4jkr9 wrote

The reality is we’re at the limit of technical knowledge. The tests are super sensitive, and the experts can’t agree on a level of thc that accurately reflects impairment because it’s not as consistent as alcohol.

I’d suggest we structure our laws so it’s only a dui if the person fails and impairment test and a drug test. If they pass the impairment test they should be off the hook. But I don’t believe we should be enabling more DUI because of how much damage they can do

1

Tyrotoxism44 t1_je48nwy wrote

I once attended a class where a medical marijuana pharmacist spoke. He worked for dispensaries and “prescribed” the medical marijuana to the people that came in. He had the doctorate degree to go with the title.

He was adamantly against a per se limit like alcohol. He agreed that it should not be zero tolerance like we currently have, but also believed that THC affected people more then the per se limits of alcohol. A daily user could have an incredibly high dosage of THC in their system and not be impaired and someone who uses THC for the first time could be very messed up off one puff.

He took the route of proving impairment which more research needs to be done on. There are officers that have some testing in drug recognition, but more scientific research could be done.

It was interesting hearing his point of view as an expert and someone who was obviously very pro medical marijuana.

7

Yen-sama t1_je3krj0 wrote

>Nothing suggests that there wouldn't be deterrents in place for impaired driving

There are already two major deterrents in place. 1. The risk of killing or at least seriously injuring somebody including yourself, and 2. The risk of getting pulled over, arrested, charged with DUI, jailed, and fined out the ass.

If someone isn't deterred by these two possibilities, what hope is there for them?

5

ArcherChase t1_je3h8jx wrote

Sadly there is zero trust with police. Since testing for THC levels isn't an accurate measurement of impairment, I normally would say have a field test. However, I've seen my multiple examples just this week of police abusing this and trying to bring in people for DUI with no alcohol in their system. They can't be trusted to treat THC impairment without a physical test.

This is yet another reason why the police suck. We cannot have good laws because those with the power to enforce them, abuse that power immediately and constantly.

55