Recent comments in /f/consoles

xNaughtyJulia t1_jalpf44 wrote

Reply to comment by RBTropical in đŸ€· by QuatronXD

I own a PS5 and a PC with a 3080 in it, and while consoles may be ‘mid range PC’s from 2 years ago’ at least all games on it run smoothly while every new release on PC these days is an unoptimized mess with stutters and frame drops all the time, not to mention denuvo hogging performance even more. These days you get better treatment in consoles and PC players are treated as second grade citizens..

2

Joshooahh t1_jal876s wrote

Reply to comment by RBTropical in đŸ€· by QuatronXD

Me and my mates go halfs on game pass ultimate that we have stacked to 2026. We used the gold to game pass ultimate upgrade for ÂŁ1 loop hole conversion saving us hundreds

0

brandonsp111 t1_jak6dqo wrote

Reply to comment by RBTropical in đŸ€· by QuatronXD

Everything was a question because I was asking you. Do you not understand how communication works? Yes that was also a question. As for the cost I was going of the OC's words. But you can use any cost you'd like!

I'm fully aware of how the hardware is today. However, unlike PCs, ANY Xbox (One, One S, One X, Series X, Series S) can play any game from any year designated for those platforms. A 2013 launch model Xbox One can play Halo Infinite from 2021. PCs definitely aren't as friendly to that degree. Consoles are far easier. Buy the box and any game will work for any of those boxes. There is absolutely no guarantee that any PC game will work with any PC.

You talk about cost like it truly matters. I can spend $400-$500 once a decade and nothing more hardware wise. Console gamers aren't like PC morons who have to sweat like a fat kid at a candy camp cause a game runs 1 frame lower than they expect it to. One part costing nearly 3/4s the whole Xbox? Wow, what a steal! What a great counter point!

You also act like consoles being weaker than the latest bleeding edge hardware (which unlike consoles releases every year) is the problem with games having to be toned down. Fine then make the game for PC only. But why don't devs do that? Cause they'd lose billions. And 9/10 times PCs only have better graphical options. There has never been a game to light the world on fire because it was released for PC only that had such a huge, vast world full of shit. It's only graphical differences. Most level headed people (i.e. NOT PC GAMERS) could care less. They'd rather have competent, enjoyable games over pretty graphics.

Yes we pay for online. We also have far less cheaters, aimbot abusers, hackers and other playing affecting experiences than the free Walmart service you try to lord over people. Free doesn't always equal good. Backwards compatibility is another debate entirely. Frankly no one does it perfectly. But PC players pirating games is equally as bad for the industry.

I remember cyberpunk quite well. I also remember that PC was by far the WORST platform to play it on. Gonna blame consoles for that too? Not Sony or Microsoft's fault it ran like shit on there.

You people are pathetic. It's always MuH pC hAs BeTtER gRaPhIcS!!! Congratulations. Everybody knows that. Guess what? We still play the same games! Amazing right? You are literally the meme of a dude shouting "quit having fun". You have to justify in any way possible that PC is superior in every way, when it's definitely 100% not. No platform is perfect. Each has its faults and advantages. But shaming people for playing on console?? Pathetic. You fat bois keep hanging out in your mom's basement with all the money you save not growing up and being an adult. The rest of us will continue to have fun and be responsible citizens that actually contribute something to society, rather than force the existence of hygiene products like you lmao.

1