Or M83, Outro is great.

This might be why every time I see an 'untitled' track on an album I twitch.

I love Sigur Ros but their album ( ) is ALL untitled and will forever make me rage, lol.

Except it isn't a false analogy simply because it doesn't have all the qualities of a Ponzi scheme.

Thinking analogies are lazy is misunderstanding their purpose. Analogies are the very means of illustrating a concept by means of comparison.

Ponzi schemes are inherently unsustainable, but they're not inherently forced.

I can have objectives to it on forced participation grounds too, but I wouldn't call it a ponzi scheme to do so.

Goodbye, tonight you alone shine in heaven(s) paradise (outro)

Intro is great

Dunno, I don't see what you're talking about

[removed]

Except that if you put the boundaries in the map, you will find that many Indians states go well into the Himalayas. Ladakh, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakand and Arunachal Pradesh come to mind.

a search for "intro" on discogss gave me 436.842 results... but 52.371 results for record titles, 529 results for artists and 238 results for labels should be excluded

this still leaves me with 330.556 results - some of them are double or even tripple because discogs counts each release/version of the same record (f.e. CD, vinyl, "special edition" etc.), but still ...it's a MUCH higher number than 694

> Which fallacy would that be?

False analogy

> It's not a material difference, because the problematic element I'm referring to is unsustainability, not whether it's fraudulent or not.

Thats a reasonable argument on its own but that’s cherry picking one aspect and using the analogy to be lazy or worse persuasive. That’s assuming it was promised the tax or age would never change. It was designed from the beginning to benefit earlier generations. I think the forced participation argument is a better leg to stand on than sustainability for the analogy due to the debatable justification of government confiscation

> It's like saying "well the police unjustifiably killing someone isnt murder because they have qualified immunity and murder means an unlawful killing", completely ignoring what informs what the definition of murder is.

Qualified immunity is civil liability. But regarding the point of the analogy, I’m not asserting that something being legal or illegal is the only consideration. I’m more simply asserting using an analogy with something that is illegal is lazy or dishonest. Generally I find analogies lazy and more often dishonest on purpose. Especially in the area of law they are very tricky and mainly used when the law is unclear

No,not that.

Zoom in to Central India. Five almost concentric raised elevations. Very big. Two side by side. Another pair below these. And one below these middle pair.

Almost like craters, but huge.

California deserves a lot of songs though

Wait there’s six 9’s in a row right there?

Thank you!

Sources:

Democracy Index: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index

GDP data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(nominal)

Graphs were created using Openoffice Calc

Aravalli Ranges. The desert lies in the rain shadow region. Monsoon rains are blocked by the mountains.

Which fallacy would that be?

It's not a material difference, because the problematic element I'm referring to is unsustainability, not whether it's fraudulent or not.

It's like saying "well the police unjustifiably killing someone isnt murder because they have qualified immunity and murder means an unlawful killing", completely ignoring what informs what the definition of murder is.

It's just sophistry.

Minimum of 4 satellites at any time baby

Home, home again, I like to be here when I can.

Who’s gonna tell this guy that a butterfly isn’t an animal….

/s

Because it's not a list of words that appear, but of whole titles. Apparently "Love" on its own isn't that common a title.

[deleted]

Full titles

My thoughts as well

If you count covers, the answer is "Crossroads", followed by "Cross Road Blues".