It's an algorithm trained to mimic human output from a prompt. It's only as good as what it was trained on, and people in general suck at hard science and advanced math.

Take, for example, how people 'tricked' ChatGPT into telling them how to make meth. It actually would give them different answers based on how they asked the question, and just in the off-chance that isn't obvious, is not how chemistry works. Also I never saw it give an answer that was actually 'right' in terms of organic chemistry, either for pure pharmaceutical grade methamphetamine (aka Desoxyn) or street meth. It sure seemed right if you didn't understand the actual chemistry. It seemed convincing, even though it was wrong- same thing with calculus, I'm guessing.

Friendly reminder Wolfram Alpha exists if someone is having trouble with calculus. It not only solves the problem, but it shows you how it solved it step-by-step so it's a good study tool too.

Why do some of the digits look like a dark red when I'm not looking directly at them, it's freaking me out!

Here’s what I found on the web.

[removed]

Everything will balance out.

Data is from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice

Created using Excel.

I love this chart design, innovative! Great job OP I would also be interested if you could share the code

That's just a lie and minimizing the problem.

Nowhere was it ever 2025 you'll need to link something serious.

It STARTS at 75% the first year, then goes lower and lower. It's not as if it will just stay at that figure when you forecast out to 2050 for example.

You ok dude?

It's ONLY gotten sooner, not later.

That is an unbelievably fascinating document. Thank you for linking.

How can it be so bad at calculus? It's a computer, for God's sake.

List of bangers right there 👆

Private bankers have a better track record for fiscal responsibility that congresscritters. I know that isn’t saying much but it is true.

The important thing is that the money be actually invested in something real and not just congress’s ability to tax future citizens.

Thank you for sharing this. My sister was diagnosed with 3c —22 years ago. She is still here. Ibrance lasted the longest (4 years ) with no side effects for her. With all the medications today, it is possible to live a long life—it’s a pain to keep going into the oncology office and getting scans for years but the outlook is so much better. 💕

Harry Nilsson has a fantastic song called One.

I don't like that hold on is considered one word

Oh yes. This is a horribly misleading title. None of these artists will be close to the top 30 lol.

OK, say your income is one quadrillion dollars. Your liabilities are 900 trillion. You have 200 trillion in unfunded liabilities. Is it a scary number now?

You can't take into account current government income trends. We simply have no idea what the budget will be like in, say, 50 years. In addition, the number usually doesn't mention which programs and what levels they're currently funded or will be funded in the future and what is an actual liability. Case in point: Social Security is a liability - it's literally our money - but welfare is not because it's an optional social program.

Eh?

Not using 22/7

I was afraid to read this. Thought I was being Rick rolled.

I, for one, always respected my computer overlords...

Are these your top artists?

I'll second both of you. It's the cut from when see levels were lower and it's freaking cool.

The title is pretty arrogant. It's "tracks recorded and published by the record industry."