But not "intro"?

This just reminds me of the matrix

I don't know any songs by any of those names

All the smart math people cone in and chime there facts on Pi and im over here like that looks like the matrix.

I appreciate the info, thanks!

Even if the source is 'right,' it might not pick up the context necessary to answer the question appropriately. I would consider the fact that different prompts resulted in different answers to what is effectively the same question might support that idea.

Maybe ChatGPT could actually give someone the answer of how to make meth correctly if given the right prompt, but in order to even know how to phrase it you'd need to know quite a bit of chemistry- and at that point, you could just as easily figure it out yourself with a pen and paper. That has the added upside of the DEA not kicking in your door for "just asking questions" too.

As far as calculus goes, I can imagine some of the inputs might be confusing to an AI that is not specifically trained for them since the minutiae of formatting is essential. There might be something inherent to calculus that the AI has difficulty understanding, or it might just be user error too. It's hard to say.

Edit: the other guy who responded's explanation is more correct, listen to them. My background in CS is woefully lacking, but their answer seems right based on my limited understanding of how this AI works.

[removed]

Okay, so what's the alternative?

Who will define the set of metrics or indicators that will measure the degree of democracy, if not a group of 'experts' whose input is compiled together?

I do agree that they could be transparent about this (and to be fair, I haven't examined their methodology to know what their methodology and degree of transparency is), but that doesn't mean that creating a democracy index is a bad idea.

intros and outros arent always songs tho

that's not the way that the system works.

You're using symbolic logic, its thinking is more like an intuition- a vastly more accurate intuition than ours, but limited nonetheless.

And the kicker? Its intuition of what words, characters etc. you are expecting to see. It doesn't really logic things out, it doesn't hold concepts of objects, numbers, mathematical operators etc.

It intuits an answer having seen a billion similar equations in the past and guesses at what characters on the keyboard you're expecting to see based on pattern matching.

I am genuinely surprised “baby” didn’t make this list

[removed]

It would be interesting to know which band has the most amount of these titles.

But surely it must rate the sources it uses. Besides it seems to be very good at SAT math, which is obviuously easier, but would rely on the same mimicry.

No where does it say "one word" in the post. These are full titles.

Goodbye You, Stay Lost Forever

The democracy index is not scientific. The publication that produces it just asks random blokes of their choosing to rate countries. They do not publish who these people are and what their ratings were. Trash data IMO. From your link, see.

"Intro into Home Time" the untitled masterpiece by Stay Outro Forever, off their platinum "Angel Lost and Alone, Hold on" album.

It’s called the Feynman Point.

"Outro" representing Portuguese language, my language.

It’s called the Feynman Point.

Ugh, quite a stark data point there.

This isn't a great graph when the consumer has to make assumptions.

Fun fact, Georgia is named after Saint George, a Christian who was martyred during the Age of the Martyrs in the 3rd/4th century.

Fun Fact #2, Saint George killed a dragon that was terrorizing a city using a lance named Ascalon. The people of the city were all so amazed that they became Christians and were baptized.

[deleted]