Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

oodex t1_jcbdm5k wrote

Reply to comment by dgdio in More Dual Income, No Kids by dwaxe

In my family of my parents age level, 5/8 have children Of those children, 3/8 have children but 3 of those without are what I'd consider "open to have children", as in no clue if they want/will or not.

In total, 8 couples (16 people) produced 8 people in my parents generation in the family. The followup 3/8 produced 4 so far.

I don't think your point has no value, but I think it doesn't target the right thing to look at, especially since you'd kinda have to consider adoption alongside with it.

1

Artistic-Breadfruit9 t1_jcbcasc wrote

This type of data surfaces every so often, and my reaction is always the same: yes, the US system is woefully inefficient BUT the population is also incredibly unhealthy. Correcting for some of these factors (obesity being a pretty good surrogate) would undoubtedly change the message.

Very nicely presented, though.

2

Wicked-Skengman t1_jcb7pry wrote

There are advantages of insurance based healthcare systems - the primary one being innovation.

It's no coincidence that the US has the largest dug companies at the cutting edge of research.

I'm not saying the US system is good by any stretch, but it has its advantages

Edit: we should also be careful with the data here - is the reason the US has a lower life expectancy a direct result of its healthcare system? I imagine theres a load of other factors such as lifestyle and diet that are more important

3

paleblued00t t1_jcb03tl wrote

One thing I notice is that critics and audience ratings agree in MCU films, whereas in most DCU films critics appear to underrate compared to the audience (notice how "blue films" are above the dotted line)

Also, Captain Marvel seems to stands out for the opposite reason

Edit : why are people downvoting me, I'm literally just reading the graph, I'm not even stating an opinion wth

0

Jackdaw99 t1_jcaxztr wrote

I would imagine the language model spihons questions off into a calculator. It would be pretty easy, considering the infinite nature of integers, to give it a simple arithmetic problem that has never been written down or even devised before. Say, "What's 356.639565777 divided by 1.6873408216337?" I would be very surprised if it didn't get this sort of thing right.

Follow-up: I just tried that calculation on ChatGPT and it got it...wrong. Twice. With different answers each time. Though it was close...

That's bizarre to me, since it couldn't have used a language model to calculate that, and in fact it explicitly told me it was sending the calculation to Python. So I don't know what's going on here.

2

aaliyaahson t1_jcat452 wrote

In 2019 after Captain Marvel was review bombed, Rotten Tomatoes came up with a verified audience score system, which only let people who actually bought a ticket for the movie leave a rating.

So the audience scores for movies before and after mid-2019 are not comparable and I wish people would stop making graphs like these without making the distinction.

2