Because basic calculation is already a solved problem. OpenAI is concerned with pushing the frontiers of AI, not with trivial integration of current systems. No one is going to use GPT for basic calculation anyways. People already have ubiquitous access to basic calculators. It's not part of GPT's core competency, so why waste time on it? What is part of GPT's core competency is an advanced ability to process language.

That's not to say that they are necessarily ignoring the math problem. But the approach you are suggesting is not an AI-based approach. You are suggesting a programmatic approach (i.e. "if this, then do this..."). If they were only concerned with turning ChatGPT into a basic calculator, that might work. But that's a dead-end. If OpenAI is addressing the math problem, they would be taking an AI approach to it (developing a model that learns math on its own). That's a much harder problem, but one with much greater returns from solving it.

Yes, I agree. Could not do that with the web app yet. The y-axis starts at 0

Why, how? What are you yalking avout???

I hope this doesn’t become the next The Walking Dead.

E3 was the most powerful episode of any series I have ever seen. It was magnificent... I wonder why it's so low rated?

I see your point but as it stands 70% of the graph does nothing but add scale

[deleted]

Which company is producing in Belgium?

[deleted]

I completely disagree, it leads to misunderstanding that way.

With rating starting at 0, you have visibility that they’re all rated pretty good, and most are excellent

Source: https://oec.world/en/profile/hs/electric-motor-vehicles

Tool: Figma

[removed]

Or proof that if you present your unpopular opinion as a fact you will get downvoted.

If you reverse this I agree

Justice for evermore (and folklore too)

Proof that if your opinion doesn't match with "THE MESSAGE" you will get downvoted into oblivion. Captain Marvel sucked and Brie Larson IS insufferable.

That doesn't make sense to me. It would be the easiest thing in the world to build a calculator into it, have it send questions which look like basic arithmetic in, and then spit out the answer. Hell, it could build access to Wolfram Alpha in. Then it wouldn't make basic mistakes and would much more impressive. And after all, that's what a person would do.

Moreover, if it doesn't have the ability to calculate at all, how did it get so close to the answer when I fed it a problem which, I'm pretty sure, no one has ever tried to solve before?

And finally, how did it do so well on the math SATs if it was just guessing at what people would expect the next digit to be?

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just baffled by why they wouldn't implement that kind of functionality. Because as it stands, no one is ever going to use it for anything that requires even basic math skills. "ChatGPT, how many bottles of wine should I buy for a party with 172 attendees?" I'm not going to shop based on its answer.

Maybe this iteration is just further Proof of Concept, but if so, all it proves is that concept is useless for many applications.

I listen to alternative, rock, electronica, world, folk, ska, and many things other than pop. I was so out of touch with what constitutes mass market music now-a-days that I actually had to ask Alexa to play a few Taylor Swift tunes the other day just to keep me in the loop. Hadn't really heard her. I know ... I live under a rock

The two last ones have the best songs tho

>Am I the only one that liked Suicide Squad?

Which one? The second was alright-ish, the first was a handful of action scenes without any kind of real structure to hold it together.

You could flip the causation around, though. If every American had ready access to see a general practitioner 1-2 times a year for a checkup at zero out of pocket cost, do you think any of those latent health issues (including obesity) would change? I’d hypothesize yes, but I could be wrong.

Tool: Adobe Illustrator
Source: https://today.yougov.com/topics/entertainment/articles-reports/2023/03/09/most-popular-taylor-swift-albums-us-ranking-fans
Methodology: This poll was conducted online on February 14 - 21, 2023 among 2,000 U.S. adult citizens. There were 832 fans of Taylor Swift — defined by people who know who Taylor Swift is and responded to the question "Are you a fan of Taylor Swift" by saying "Yes, I'm a big fan of Taylor Swift" or "Yes, I'm a fan of Taylor Swift." Respondents were selected from YouGov’s opt-in panel using sample matching. A random sample (stratified by gender, age, race, education, geographic region, and voter registration) was selected from the 2019 American Community Survey. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2020 election turnout and presidential vote, baseline party identification, and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Baseline party identification is the respondent’s most recent answer given prior to March 15, 2022, and is weighted to the estimated distribution at that time (33% Democratic, 28% Republican). The margin of error for the overall sample is approximately 2%.

Graph itself; y axis should start at ~7 so you can better highlight differences

Well, you're entitled to your opinion I guess

But what are the criteria for establishing a value of x_i ?