Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

JigglyWiener t1_jch134x wrote

Broken clocks who will now spend the rest of their lives convinced that their own interpretation of "common sense" is relevant in the face of a complex issue with limited evidence.

Instead of waiting for evidence, they picked the solution that put accessible scapegoats in their hometowns. That turned into actual violence and vandalism.

It was not based in rationality or a desire for truth, it was based in a desire to find a simple explanation that agreed with their biases and allowed them to feel like they had control over something they did not.

3

mukenwalla t1_jch0lrp wrote

I wouldn't say "extremely unlikely random combination of viruses leading to a pandemic" considering that is exactly what happened a few years prior with the SARS-CoV-1 virus. And we have evidence of it being a spill over event based on early cases surrounding the markets of Wuhan. The truth is we don't know right now what the origin was.

1

rockinvet02 t1_jch0b6q wrote

No that's not what I'm asking at all you snarky ass. The other answer is probably the correct one, that being the average for that day historically.

I was assuming a cumulative average or even a moving average was being used and if that were the case then there should not be a scenario where adding a current measurement that is lower than the average would actually raise the average. If I need to point you to the actually moment where this happens, I will be happy to.

3

MasterDio64 OP t1_jcgxnpa wrote

Sources

https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/data/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_universities_in_the_United_States_by_endowment

Tools

R

I made this so I could learn how to use R and it took me waaay longer than I thought it would to make this.

I actually expected there to be a higher correlation between endowment and acceptance rate, but I guess that's just not the case. That being said, the amount of cash these universities have is insane, but what the top 4 has is just beyond nuts...

5

iamahorseindisguise OP t1_jcgv33e wrote

Source: Federal Rail Association (https://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/officeofsafety/publicsite/query/TenYearAccidentIncidentOverview.aspx) DM me for the .csv file. Data is available from 1975 to 2022.

Tool: Basic Plot in R

The plot shows total hazmat train derailment from 1997 to 2022 in the United States. The total derailment is divided by the total number of miles driven by trains for that year.

The lowest hazmat derailment per total train miles was in 1986 at 79.6 hazmat derailments/10 million miles (450 total that year). Notably , the total employee hours worked has been steadily decreasing since 1975. I am unable to tell whether there has been an increase or decrease in derailments due to changes in regulation.

3