[deleted]

[deleted]

I don't like this graph. Why add color if you're not gonna use it. You could leave out the piechart from this picture and it would be easier to understand.

Cleaning was nearly 80% of my work for some projects...

[removed]

This is a tough graph to read easily; the colour is completely redundant. You might as well have just shown the table at the bottom because it shows all the information without having to cross check with anything else.

I’m being a bit nit picky but either colouring the text to match up with the pie or creating some numeric legend would improve the readability.

It matches up with the lifecycle during a sprint. 😂

Finding data that is applicable to the premise at hand and deciding whether has value is always the biggest question for me

Data from r/datascience poll.

Infographic made with Adobe Illustrator.

[removed]

Shouldn't have used the vernacular "bookie", which might be more region-specific. If you win 100,000 on a pick 6 will you be banned? What if it happened once a year? Or once every two years and still enough to be profitable? Once again, maybe it's a U.K. thing. Tracks do not ban players because they win, nor do online casinos/wagering sites, in the U.S.

I think your naive is you don’t think the vast majority of general population having a random bet AREN’T taking one of these strategies.

People who bet “seriously”, obviously not. But I’d be shocked if the vast majority of blow ins for. A big race weekend don’t either have a favorite or roughies approach.

Yeah, you don't really make money from any kind of gambling by playing the odds/maths alone but by playing the people or having more information than others.. My brother used to make money from online poker, but he was a very average poker player. His entire strategy was based on profiling other players to rate them as good or bad and then joining games that have a large number of bad players... My point being many people DO play in a simplistic way, if there are enough naive players you can take relatively more of their money.

No one employs these strategies. This is a naive analysis.

Plenty of sharp money makes profit from gambling. Tony Bloom is a notable, high-profile figure who made all his money from gambling, and still generates large sums from it. He has been so successful in mathematically calculating value bets he is now the owner of Brighton football club, and the 'Asian handicap' exists because of him.

You have a very basic understanding of gambling and are coming at it from a biased angle that presumes to treat everyone like children that shouldn't be left to the consequences of their own bad decisions.

What are you on about? Bookmakers have every incentive to restrict winning players and they do, rather quickly.

Incorrect. Winning (value oriented) players get restricted very quickly, and recent "responsible gambling checks" are used to avoid making payouts.

I looked each day to see if there was anything to bet on, there’s too many horses in most of the races, too much of a lotter, even then the favourites were very short priced.

Yeah you are not getting restricted for winning at horse racing, I think the only thing they restrict you for is 21 if you are counting cards. And not many people can do that

What kind of debt is it? I feel like mortgages alone would be bigger, but maybe not.

New FREE resource available for all things SSA from a former SSA District Manager: https://www.youtube.com/@MyGovExpert

> they had a difficult time making themselves anyone’s first choice.

Had a friend who went there for undergrad and even before he started he knew about the infamous saying of "the place where fun goes to die".

A top-rated STEM school for < $10k per year? ISU is the best deal for Iowa students.

alright, I'm still young. I got plenty to time to hone my craft. Where can I start my path on becoming the best horse racing handicapper in the world?

Gig 'em or Hook 'em (horns)

T E X A S

Oh! I assumed it was municipal debt.