Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

mbmccurdy OP t1_jd2kn9y wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in [OC] NHL Playoff Chances by mbmccurdy

It's displayed as 100% only because the true probability is closer to 100% than it is to 99%, and I didn't want to quote a finer precision. If they were guaranteed of the spot I would have removed the number completely.

1

mdvarn84 t1_jd2iwc9 wrote

What is this type of chart called? I’ve seen many different visuals for data that I’ve never seen before in this subreddit. Leafs fan too by the way…the struggle is real.

1

YeahIGotNuthin t1_jd2h7na wrote

It’s still going to get dark.

In the middle of the day.

Quickly.

In the span of a couple minutes It goes from “shadows are weird shaped!” to “okay, weird light, like when it’s snowing but sun shines through a bit” to “huh, THIS ain’t right” to full-on “ohmygod…” except whispered, because it feels wrong to speak out loud in normal voice.

I drove three hours last time to park at the side of a dirt road running through a field. Totally worth it.

6

EggplantOrphan t1_jd2gjbu wrote

−9

rajhm t1_jd2da0g wrote

I am guessing for that number, Schwab is the brokerage, not the asset manager. At Schwab's brokerage people have money in stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, bonds, etc. Some of the funds and ETFs are like iShares ETFs and contributing to Blackrock's AUM number.

Basically for the number being quoted, Blackrock has voting rights for the stock shares portion of that AUM. Schwab only has the same for those invested in Schwab's own funds.

3

prpslydistracted t1_jd2c24k wrote

I know ... but why seed?

We all know what it means. But normally one can trace the evolution of terms in language but with such a commonly used word this one doesn't follow. https://www.merriam-webster.com/ mentions an athlete being top "seeded" but not the origin of the term. https://www.dictionary.com/ only relates to the obvious in biology.

Example; the word slave can be traced back to the Middle Ages to Slavic, when central Europeans were traded as slaves.

2

No_Movie8460 t1_jd2blj0 wrote

My previous account is 14 years. My experience with Reddit was that it was really based around like hobbies IIRC. It was (without sounding cheesey) a bit more intellectual as there was no real alternative so people with niche hobbies would come and use it to discuss stuff super specific to a topic.

Most of my friends in senior highschool in 2010-2012 got into it, mainly due to our interests in geocaching and coding.

It was a lot less shitposty, less memes, bots, astroturfing and agenda posts, but it was a bit more dry and you couldn’t really spend countless hours just scrolling. It was more of a look at the front page which was much more dynamic to your specific interests. Look at your few favourite subreddits for a couple of minutes, then leave.

Then in like 2012-2015 it started becoming really, really political - and then it absorbed a lot of the Tumblr era content once it changed its policies (don’t remember what the exact change was). I think that because of the demographic that used it (mainly college age people) it skewed to the left a fair bit, and then once it absorbed small sites and become larger it attracted the typical online crowd.

6