Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

underlander t1_jd492p4 wrote

so the chart’s kind of misleading. A reasonable person reading this (like me) would assume that “figure” is synonymous with “toy,” so we’re looking at whether or not the kinder egg had anything inside. But you’re saying what’s being measured here is whether it has something that you want, personally. So, that’s really confusing without an explanation

0

inkoativ OP t1_jd48bgd wrote

The right hand plot gives an indication of such a plot. The blog post, where the figure is taken from, contains such a smoothed line obtained from applying some machine learning classification algorithm to the task (deliberate overkill! :-)).

http://staff.math.su.se/hoehle/blog/figure/source/2016-12-23-surprise/CLASSIFIEROUTPUT-1.png

Source: https://mhoehle.github.io/blog/2016/12/23/surprise.html

0

underlander t1_jd44bdb wrote

something’s weird here. How can a kinder egg, which comes out of an automatic manufacturing facility, vary by up to 10g and still not have a toy inside? The median weight of the candy is about 32g, so how do you get +/-5g, a big difference for such a lightweight candy, so regularly if there’s not a toy inside?

1

mojotooth t1_jd3wb74 wrote

Okay, hold up. I typed in "Lexington." Are you trying to tell me that the entire state of Kentucky is covered with counties that would be referring to the Lexingtons in other states rather than Lexington, KY?

I'm sorry but that is completely broken. You have something very busted in your dataset.

1

123xyz321Z t1_jd3rwbh wrote

We looked the other way when Saudi Arabia took down the world trade centers, killed Kashogi, and had a horrible war with Yemen. We still consider them our ally. I don’t know why people are so confused about China wanting to be Russia’s friend. They have so many resources that they need.

11