Recent comments in /f/dataisbeautiful

harkening t1_jdwu7ef wrote

Great Britain isn't England. England is about 60% of Great Britain, which includes Scotland and Wales.

As you can see on your Belgium "zoom," the entire country can fit centered on south and western England and be comparably dense. The Midlands are also moderately dense, while only northern England, Scotland, and Wales are truly sparse. Notably for Scotland, since I looked it up quickly, the population density is 1/15 that of Belgium on average. But it's all concentrated in the areas that are connected.

1

budgetthrowaway1209 OP t1_jdwtt0r wrote

Thanks - I hear you about the psychology of underreporting, but I feel like there has to be (or should be) more nuance.

And the one or two studies I’ve seen have had issues with lack of segmentation or reporting scales, or articles written that misconstrue the insights to get a good headline.

Like I mentioned, I don’t think of class as a 3-point scale solely on income (upper, middle, lower). If that were the case, I don’t think you would need surveys. IMO, it’s a mix of wealth (not just income), lifestyle & disposable spend that needs to be looked at in a segmented (geo, age, etc.) to have value. For example, maybe when we’re in our 50s, I would think of us as a higher class, but not with our high, high fixed expenses and coming out of school a few years ago. It should also be more granular than a 3 point scale, but that’s neither here nor there.

Do we have a 1% or 2% income for the US? Sure. But as /u/TriFolk mentions, it’s more complicated.

Anecdotally, I just purchased some jeans the other day and signed up for a rewards program to save $ on shipping and found a discount code, so it’s hard for me to classify us in the same group as the older folks driving Lucids around Manhattan Beach, it that makes sense.

1

ninpou-choujuu-giga t1_jdwp2t3 wrote

Compare these maps with population density. For example Italy vs France (here. If we consider infrastructures, the South of Italy compares better with Africa than with Europe. And someone is considering to build a bridge between Calabria and Sicilia on Stretto di Messina. We will have a beautiful cathedral in the fucking desert.

−1

leg_day t1_jdwn6vu wrote

I thought the same. But when you add it up, your effective tax rate is 40%... meanwhile, Trump paid an effective tax rate of 4% in 2018. And he's certainly not the only true 0.1%er paying ridiculously low effective tax rates.

So take any win you can get against the system.

(FWIW, 40% effective rate on a 568k W2 income is pretty damn great especially in a high tax regime like CA. Similar income profile in NYC and I sit around 45-49% effective tax rate.)

2