In my experience, they dont ALL need one-on-ones but it certainly is helpful to meet individually.

In my experience, it can usually be meeting 2-3 people in a day (30-45 mins each) and a few over phone calls.

I interviewed with ~4 firms last year, all of which were 6-8 interviews (where i also count the case study and/or excel test as a round).

I’ve never done more then 2 interviews. No way I’m coming back 4-5 times

That's awesome. I know someone who does that specifically for college sports teams. They're doing really well and everyone they work with has nothing but good things to say.

I always thought of Califronia as a rich state with glamourous Holywood people. Same with New York with its wal street and rich investment bankers.

Imagine adding skill test (= competition contest) on top of that : Become a 3d artist.

Work market is insane and they tell us nobody's want to work anymore lmao.

Misread this as age distribution in car passengers, and was very confused by the batching

No, they just buy up al the old cars from western Europe

Switzerland	Germany

Population: 8,703,000 83,196,000

Inhabitants/km²: 210.8 232.7

Doing analysis? hammering out strategy? It can do all that already. And when those other teams are AI why would you want the human element slowwing it down

Why do companies feel it's appropriate to ghost someone after 4 interviews, that's insane. So much time invested by both sides at that point.

So you’re telling me communism is better at making long lasting cars than long lasting states.

[removed]

Not sure what exactly OP had in mind, but it certainly better illustrates structural differences between the countries, as well as oddities within the countries.

People already explained why Galicia in northwestern Spain looks so different (the settlements are smaller, making the population more spread out), but there are also details in other countries that make me curious. For example why Saxony has such a noticeably denser network than the rest of eastern Germany (with the exception of Berlin, of course).

Do you also have data for Austria?

We used a mindfulness app/coach for our college sports team. High level, power 5 school. I believe they worked with most sports there. I enjoyed it a lot and definitely saw the value

I think PMs typically work with a lot of teams. They’re partly a coordinator role. All the interviews may be meeting with the leader of each team

I'm more liberal than most but support completely repealing the SALT cap. Why? I'd rather my taxes go first toward city, county, and state taxes, closer to where they are spent.

Lower city, county, and state taxes are correlated with much higher spend from federal tax dollars.

I can talk to the city council member to advocate for funding a project to refurbish a local park. No way I can meaningfully talk to my congress person about how federal tax money is being spent in Iowa.

8th interview? That’s nuts.

When you feel stressed, remember to calmly breathe.

It's one of the few things we can do that directly affects our parasympathetic nervous system. (I think that's the term)

Breath signals your heart and brain to come out of the stress-hornome cycle.

Game changer that.

Mr. Fancypants can't make it work with a bus that picks him up at 9:47 and returns him home at 15:22? /s

In switzerland the trains not only connect the capitals.You can drive with the train to jungfraujoch 3454m.If you drive from Chur 515 to Brig 491 (both capitals) you can drive up to the Oberalppass 2042m down to andermatt 1400m and up again to furka 2100m.

Allthough its faster to drive the long way around with the tunnels.The huge benefit is that switzerland is so small, way easier to build lasting infrastructure.

i just checked for lulz.

Avila-valladoid-gijon with train only is 2400m up and 3500m down with 393km.
Brig-andermatt-chur with train only is 4100 up and 4100 down with 280km.

And they all need 1 on 1's?? You can easily get a culture feel with 2-3 interviews even in a group setting. 8 interviews is just ludicrous lol

I did some quick data analysis because your comment made me curious, and it looks like there are only very weak correlations (R^2 < 0.2) between state GDP or average income and SPM values with low slope trendlines. I can see where the idea comes from, though, with many of the richest states also having high SPM. That said, there are notable exceptions (Illinois, Washington, Massachusetts, etc.) to this, and you can see many of the poorest states also have high SPM values. All in all, it's a wash.

Yeha you make a good point but I mean... Isn't that the whole point of the graphic?

[removed]