Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
Peter_deT t1_je4aw29 wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why are US Government agencies seemingly so unwilling to cooperate with one another? by jollygoodkiwi
Law enforcement agencies keep investigative information close - often down to the investigative team, doling it out in small packets on a strict 'need to know' basis (with the team judging who needs to know). This is a major block to effective intelligence work, but they are all paranoid about leaks, and well aware that higher-ups will leak for publicity, fellow officers jump on their turf and others are connected to the targets. The FBI follows this pattern. The CIA, as part of the intelligence community, does not trust law enforcement, for all these reasons, and shares on a selective need to know. It does cooperate with the rest of the intelligence community, at least on the gathering side (less so on operations).
They do run joint clearing centres, with wide access, but these again have issues with dissemination. Basically, there's no single standard for clearance, little coordination and a lot of mutual mistrust.
virusofthemind t1_je4atrf wrote
Reply to ELI5: How do hotel door electronic locks know your card is valid vs. cancelled if they're not talking to the front desk all the time? by kepler1
Most locking systems in hotel rooms such as KABA are Ving don't communicate with the front desk unit.
The actual door locks themselves have their address programed into them as well as the current time.
When the receptionist cuts a new key as soon as it's used in the lock it invalidates the previous key unless it's a master key used by staff or an emergency key used by security; they're permanently valid unless the cards are accidently wiped or there's a security breach such as a master key stolen (in which case a new set of master keys is issued).
The new key has its expiry date programmed into it. Once the clock in the lock exceeds the time programmed into the key card then the lock won't work anymore.
Flair_Helper t1_je4asw3 wrote
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Information about a specific or narrow issue (personal problems, private experiences, legal questions, medical inquiries, how-to, relationship advice, etc.) are not allowed on ELI5.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
Flair_Helper t1_je4aqyp wrote
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Questions based on a false premise are not allowed on ELI5. A question based on a false premise is one based on information that may not be true, or may not be the whole truth, and needs that information to stand as a question.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
Graega t1_je4ap68 wrote
Reply to comment by BaBaFiCo in eli5 why ancient historical buildings haven’t been kept up? Why are buildings like the Parthenon and the Colosseum in such disrepair? Greece and Rome/Italy have existed the entire time? by PickledSpace56
Besides, if you repainted everything Greek to the colors they actually were, your eyes would bleed. I imagine ancient Greece was less Houses of the Holy and more my nephew with a box of crayons and no supervision.
Flair_Helper t1_je4amvq wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why are US Government agencies seemingly so unwilling to cooperate with one another? by jollygoodkiwi
Please read this entire message
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Loaded questions are not allowed on ELI5. A loaded question is one that posits a specific view of reality and asks for explanations that confirm it. A loaded question, by definition, presumes that something must be true in order for the question to stand.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
kukukachu_burr t1_je4acc1 wrote
Reply to ELI5: For those in a married relationship with strong built trust, why take more invasive methods of contraception, when less invasive methods such as condoms exist? by Flat_Basket4965
Which invasive methods are you asking about?
liberatedlemur t1_je4a99e wrote
Reply to comment by the_actuary in ELI5: For those in a married relationship with strong built trust, why take more invasive methods of contraception, when less invasive methods such as condoms exist? by Flat_Basket4965
why I (F) actually don't mind condoms at all :) but my partner (M) definitely does!
liberatedlemur t1_je4a812 wrote
Reply to ELI5: For those in a married relationship with strong built trust, why take more invasive methods of contraception, when less invasive methods such as condoms exist? by Flat_Basket4965
having to think about it "in the moment". Stopping "the action" to put on a condom (plus, of course, making sure you have some! shopping, storing, bringing with you if you aren't home, etc)
When someone is on hormonal contraception, or has an IUD, or some kind of permanent contraception (vasectomy, tubal ligation) -- never have to think about it. Just... go with the flow in the moment :) no barriers, no stopping, no thinking about it.
the_lusankya t1_je4a17x wrote
Reply to ELI5: For those in a married relationship with strong built trust, why take more invasive methods of contraception, when less invasive methods such as condoms exist? by Flat_Basket4965
The more invasive methods are more reliable, even when compared to perfect use of the less invasive methods.
the_actuary t1_je49zkc wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5: For those in a married relationship with strong built trust, why take more invasive methods of contraception, when less invasive methods such as condoms exist? by Flat_Basket4965
Condoms are less cleaup afterwards, less hassle.
nerdsonarope t1_je49oh2 wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why are US Government agencies seemingly so unwilling to cooperate with one another? by jollygoodkiwi
Nearly every giant company has some degree of this among its own departments and divisions. The US government is like a super-giant company.
Olympus___Mons t1_je48ww8 wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why are US Government agencies seemingly so unwilling to cooperate with one another? by jollygoodkiwi
This stove piping of information also benefits government contractors offering solutions. They take advantage of this non sharing of information and sell and develop products for each agency, when the government already paid for the products once before.
Stove piping information can be to maintain control and make sure your program is funded. To remain relevant, these agencies are run by people who also have a self serving interest, as well as most being patriots. They want to be the Patriot in charge.
[deleted] t1_je48ucp wrote
w0mbatina t1_je48l8p wrote
Reply to comment by phiwong in eli5 why ancient historical buildings haven’t been kept up? Why are buildings like the Parthenon and the Colosseum in such disrepair? Greece and Rome/Italy have existed the entire time? by PickledSpace56
There are actually roman arenas that are still in use. The Nimes and Pula arena both host music shows. You even have live dvds by Metallica and Rammstein from the Nimes arena. Its pretty awesome.
nishitd t1_je48j1d wrote
Reply to comment by nMiDanferno in ELI5: Everyone knows that Ticketmaster is the biggest scumbucket enterprise on the planet yet no band seems able to avoid their grasp. What's to stop a really major act (e.g. Taylor Swift) from performing in venues that are not controlled by Ticketmaster, or just setting up a parallel company? by havereddit
This. A lot of artists outrage in public, and some of them are genuine, but most of them profit from this scam, so they profit without being the bad guy.
ave369 t1_je48e1h wrote
Reply to eli5 why ancient historical buildings haven’t been kept up? Why are buildings like the Parthenon and the Colosseum in such disrepair? Greece and Rome/Italy have existed the entire time? by PickledSpace56
Nope, they didn't exist for the entire time. Greece was missing from the map for centuries; at first, it was a part of the Eastern Roman Empire (though a core part), then a part of the Ottoman Empire (an oppressed colony). Italy was split into disparate city states for the entirety of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. The city of Rome was held by the powerful Papal State (a much larger predecessor to modern day Vatican), but it was not interested in preserving "pagan" monuments (the same could be said about the Eastern Roman Empire).
iCameToLearnSomeCode t1_je47u8x wrote
Reply to comment by FinnRazzelle in ELI5: Everyone knows that Ticketmaster is the biggest scumbucket enterprise on the planet yet no band seems able to avoid their grasp. What's to stop a really major act (e.g. Taylor Swift) from performing in venues that are not controlled by Ticketmaster, or just setting up a parallel company? by havereddit
You forget they are also Sirius satellite radio and pandora.
If you refuse to preform for them they'll take you off air and make sure you're essentially forgotten.
BaBaFiCo t1_je47kqc wrote
Reply to comment by PickledSpace56 in eli5 why ancient historical buildings haven’t been kept up? Why are buildings like the Parthenon and the Colosseum in such disrepair? Greece and Rome/Italy have existed the entire time? by PickledSpace56
We've shifted away from restoration, which was more popular in previous eras, to preservation.
big_troublemaker t1_je47kji wrote
Reply to comment by KrazzeeKane in ELI5: Everyone knows that Ticketmaster is the biggest scumbucket enterprise on the planet yet no band seems able to avoid their grasp. What's to stop a really major act (e.g. Taylor Swift) from performing in venues that are not controlled by Ticketmaster, or just setting up a parallel company? by havereddit
Not sure why? Ever heard of showers, wcs, etc? I addmitedly attend smaller festivals (tens of thousands not hundreds) but they are just so plush... High quality food, great music, open air, people. And at night I go to sleep in my hotel to come back fresh and relaxed next morning.
bingobangomonk t1_je4b88w wrote
Reply to comment by Negative_Bake_9764 in ELI5: why is it ok to take paracetamol to break a fever? by tiph12
Ok Karl