[removed]

CPS in England / Wales.

Procurator Fiscal in Scotland.

Only for extremely large values of 2.

In the UK we don't have the same process. Rather than have a prosecution go to a jury, without hearing a defence, and allow them to decide if there is a case to answer we have the CPS (England and Wales) or Procurator Fiscal (Scotland) who make those decisions on whether a case has sufficient evidence to go ahead.

It means you had Soul Level 99

48 vitality 66 endurance 12 attunement 16 strength 10 dexterity

Giants giants giants Father mask Chaos two hander Grass crest shield Black flame

It means you pwned some noobz on PVP and became a legend.

[removed]

The difference is largely historical.

Data storage devices are byte-addressable, in that the smallest unit of data you can read one write is one byte. We long ago standardized on 8-bits per byte, but in early computing there were different byte sizes.

Early data transmission devices (what we now call network hardware) measured their speed in bits per second. The byte wasn’t standardized as 8 bits yet, and different ends of the transmission might have different byte sizes.

Modern networking gear basically always sends data in some whole number of 8-bit bytes (in the context of networking they are sometimes called octets to be absolutely clear they are 8-bit units), but the bits per second terminology persists.

You wouldn’t want to be the manufacturer who unilaterally shifts to bytes per second when you peers are still marketing bits per second, for fear of people thinking your stuff is slower than it is!

I laughed very hard at this. Thankyou.

>Let’s not forget that Trump is one of the worst testifiers of all time. He BETTER take his lawyers seriously when they forbid him from taking the stand, because who knows what he will say on the stand to make things worse.

"I worked on that cross-examination for six months and then he... just... tweeted it out." - Lead Prosecutor, probably.

“Indictment: a formal accusation that someone has committed a crime!”

Are the grand jury random people from the US?

Do they all have to agree on the indictment or would it also be an indictment if only, say 6 out of 10 grand jury members, think the person should be investigated?

But 5 is less than 3!

EDIT: Why am I being downvotee? 3!=6>5

The Thing about grand jury's are that they are given almost unlimited investigative power, via the ability to subpoena people and things.

They can happen in either order.

In New York State, you can be arrested for a felony without an indictment, if the police have probable cause to believe you committed a crime. The charging document is called a Felony Complaint. After the arrest, unless a disposition can be worked out between the DA's office and the defense (such as a guilty plea or reduced charges), the only way for the case to proceed to trial is via indictment. You cannot go to trial in New York on a Felony Complaint.

Alternatively, if a felony is committed, the DA's office can choose to present evidence to the Grand Jury and secure an indictment before the target is arrested, it's known as a De Novo indictment. After the indictment is secured, the defendant is arrested and arraigned on the indictment and the case proceeds exactly the same as if the defendant had already been arrested on a felony complaint.

[removed]

Let’s not forget that Trump is one of the worst testifiers of all time. He BETTER take his lawyers seriously when they forbid him from taking the stand, because who knows what he will say on the stand to make things worse. It’s not entirely clear that he even registers when he is lying, it is so ingrained in his style of speaking it’s barely conscious. It seems like he just says what he wants to be true and assumes it therefore is, which is a major problem when under oath.

Trump is going to want to take the stand 100% though, and it’s unclear if he will let his lawyers stop him. They have succeeded in the past, but he despises them for it and chafes at the idea of not being able to tell his story, and the more it happens the more resisting he becomes the next time.

We could very easily see perjury charges if he isn’t smart about this.

basically. skynet. they want to prevent skynet. AI's are at the point now where they can quickly access data and generate answer and pass off as being human. eventually, they might evolve and become skynet.

How guys from NY ask for head. “Gimme some Oral-B”

Thank you for the answer.

Does it mean that every trial has started with an indictment or is it only for a limited list of "crimes" ?

In many countries, the prosecutor decides himself if sbdy should go to trial.

A case this high profile not even a grand jury would function as a scapegoat. If they got the indictment but not the conviction because they overplayed the evidence they had…let’s just say it would not be a positive career move. They absolutely want the opinion of the grand jury on the evidence they have and playing fast and loose with bias to get the indictment with weak evidence would be self-destructive.

Hormones dude. Adrenaline and cortisol are both responsible for fight or flight and they are the hormones involved in response. Anger is triggered by the brain, which releases those hormones, which escalates the anger. If you are not careful, you end up with a positive feedback loop which can result in rage. Learning to control anger is a important life skill. Otherwise, we’d all just kill each other whenever we get angry.

Are you an AI generated post? Is any of this real? Once we stop knowing what is real/man made or not we lose control and control is what its all about.

Because some things are and some things are not.

The other thing that will happen is that the more Trump plays footsy with the legal system, the more the rats will want to get off the sinking ship.

With the prospect of a second Trump term less likely, they're be more mouths to feed than cronyism to feed them, and his ability to stave off witnesses and prevent other issues in civil court lessens.

Grand Jury is definitely more interesting than normal jury duty, I’ll say that. Potentially way more traumatic though. Though for cases like this it wouldn’t be a normal grand jury, who are usually empaneled to a good amount of cases over a week, two week, sometimes multiple months in certain jurisdiction. I’m pretty sure for something this big the grand jury was only empaneled for this specifically.

Note that for grand juries the person being accused doesn’t get representation, nor is there a judge. The DA leads the proceedings. That’s why you hear things like “You could indict a ham sandwich”. Generally speaking, a committed DA can close to always get an indictment. Though with cases like this with major political ramifications I doubt there was much bias involved. Getting the indictment only for him to be found not guilty at trial because you overplayed your hand could be career ending. They honestly do want insight into how a jury will see the evidence, what questions they have about it, etc. It would be profoundly foolish to waste the opportunity on just getting an indictment with weak evidence.