Recent comments in /f/explainlikeimfive
gg_wellplait t1_jee36vm wrote
Reply to comment by GalFisk in ELI5 Why does a Minus Negative turn into a Plus? by doggie_doggie
Please fry my brain...how do you turn away from the line???!
[deleted] t1_jee36jd wrote
Mitchelltrt t1_jee33x6 wrote
Reply to comment by GsTSaien in ELi5 If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? by cashmoneyhash
Nope. Particles appear in pairs, then collide with their pair and disappear. It is honestly freaky. Like, subatomic particles appearing in electron-positron or proton and its pair that I can't remeber the name of.
togtogtog t1_jee33oa wrote
Reply to comment by 13artzklauser in ELI5 The New Shape - The Hat by 13artzklauser
Imagine the tiling is on a wall outside, and goes on for miles.
Now imagine you wanted to take a photo of the tiling.
With squares, or triangles, you could take two different photos of the wall in two different places, but the photos would be identical. You wouldn't be able to tell them apart.
With 'the hat' the two different photos would be different.
In reality, eventually, 'the hat' tiling does repeat, but not anywhere near enough for it to be noticeable.
EveningSea7378 t1_jee3178 wrote
Reply to comment by GalFisk in ELI5 Why does a Minus Negative turn into a Plus? by doggie_doggie
> tell him that there's also a way to turn away from the number line, and go above or below it.
Only if you totaly change the deffinition of what your numberline is on the way. You can not find i in the natural numbers.
remarkablemayonaise t1_jee2y8r wrote
Reply to comment by whiskeysixkilo in eli5: Why do seemingly all battery powered electronics need at least 2 batteries? by OneGuyJeff
The Lithium cells are rechargeable (typically) or are very specialised single use.
The chemistry of cheap single use cells is based around 1-2V. I'm sure there is some chicken and egg problem where cheap cells could be developed with a higher voltage, but typically higher voltages involve batteries of tried and tested cheap cells.
grat_is_not_nice t1_jee2xmt wrote
Think about a bubble of air, exhaled by a diver deep under the ocean. It is compressed by the pressure of the water around it. It starts out small. All the oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide molecules are close together. But as it rises, the pressure lessens. The bubble gets bigger, and as it does so, the space between individual molecules increases. Nothing fills those spaces between the molecules, it just gets bigger. But the distance between atoms in those molecules does not change.
Our universe is a sort of bubble of space-time, expanding into a higher-dimensional space or a quantum vacuum. Like the atoms in our air molecules, local distances stay the same. But looking further away, we can see that things far away always get further away, wherever we look. This is the expansion of the universe.
Unlike a bubble under water, our universe does not have a edge that can be detected from within it. No matter where you look, it all looks the same. Space-time might be a closed sphere, so that if you travelled in a straight line, you would end up where you started. It could be a torus (like a donut) where you might travel in a straight line and never return to where you started. There are many other curved options for our universe. Some are closed and some are not. We don't know, and we may never know.
shotsallover t1_jee2vql wrote
Reply to comment by Pyryn in ELi5 If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? by cashmoneyhash
You should read Flatland if you haven't.
[deleted] t1_jee2nem wrote
Reply to ELI5 The New Shape - The Hat by 13artzklauser
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jee2hxe wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5: If the chemical dopamine stimulates a 'feel good' sensation, is there a chemical that makes us angry? by Kree_Horse
[removed]
13artzklauser OP t1_jee245u wrote
Reply to comment by togtogtog in ELI5 The New Shape - The Hat by 13artzklauser
Thank you for your explanation. What do you mean by "which bit of the tiling you look at?"
[deleted] t1_jee22nm wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5: If the chemical dopamine stimulates a 'feel good' sensation, is there a chemical that makes us angry? by Kree_Horse
[removed]
EcchiOli t1_jee1v55 wrote
Reply to comment by Pyryn in ELi5 If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? by cashmoneyhash
A highschool physics teacher tried to explain it to us, before sighing and saying we'd see if we pursue education in this field otherwise screw it, with the idea that we measure the position of things as if they're in a grid.
One moment the nearby grid is 1 million blocks wide for the x, y and z axis. The following moment, the grid measures the same things but it's a 1 million and 1 blocks for the x, y and z axis. Some moments later, it's now 1 million and 2 blocks, still for the very same things inside. From our perspective on the inside, it gives an impression of getting further away.
[deleted] t1_jee1h6j wrote
defalt86 t1_jee17zh wrote
Reply to comment by MidnightAdventurer in Eli5 why does a survey need to have a minimum of 30 respondees to be statistically significant? by shashwathj
Fair enough. We would have to look at the many, many other studies that have already been done that prove America is truly a fascist state.
homeboi808 t1_jee15d5 wrote
You can think of - like “opposite of add”.
If you owe me $1, you have now -$1 compared to before.
If I do the opposite, now I give you $1 and now you have +$1 compared to before.
Antman013 t1_jee1425 wrote
Reply to comment by skiveman in ELI5: Desalination Economics by twodollarprophet
There have been studied. The costs to bring those volumes of water to where it's needed make it nigh on impossible.
GsTSaien t1_jee13cy wrote
Reply to comment by Mitchelltrt in ELi5 If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? by cashmoneyhash
Particles just appear???? Wait are you sure? Wouldn't that require creating more mass and energy from nothing?
MidnightAdventurer t1_jee0yg1 wrote
Reply to comment by defalt86 in Eli5 why does a survey need to have a minimum of 30 respondees to be statistically significant? by shashwathj
Technically, you can say "Americans think America is fascist" not that it actually is. This is another common error that people make with data - You can only draw conclusions about what you actually measured and for surveys in particular, the way you ask the questions can have a big impact on the results
Asking people what they think is only measuring what they think, not measuring against an objective standard. To answer if America is actually fascist, you'd need to define some measurable parameters for what that means then collect data on those parameters
th3h4ck3r t1_jee0wjl wrote
Reply to comment by TheBestMePlausible in eli5: Why do seemingly all battery powered electronics need at least 2 batteries? by OneGuyJeff
You absolutely can, but by now it's standardized that A-series batteries (AA, AAA, even AAAA) will put out 1.5 V, same as C and D batteries. It's societal inertia that prevents it, nothing else; why change if it ain't broken?
Button cells, however, commonly work at 3 V, and are standardized at that voltage.
Mitchelltrt t1_jee0t53 wrote
Reply to comment by GsTSaien in ELi5 If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? by cashmoneyhash
You are correct. The space itself has no energy, no mass, no anything. However, particles sponaneously appear within that nothing.
Barneyk t1_jee0kjt wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELi5 If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? by cashmoneyhash
>You are in infinitely large universe
We don't know that. We have no idea how big the Universe actually is.
If we extrapolate from the observable universe with the angles we can measure it should be at least 2.5 million times as big as the observable universe. At least. With no upper limit.
Or maybe we don't quite understand things as well and it is smaller.
Or maybe it is infinite.
We don't know.
MidnightAdventurer t1_jee0dab wrote
Think of the minus as taking something away and addition as giving something back. If you take something away from the things that are going to be taken away then it is effectively being given back. This is what the double negative is representing
For example:
You have $10 and owe your friend $6 so now you have $4 left. Now, lets say that your friend decides that he'll forgive $2 from the debt. So, the debt is now $4 (6-2 =4).
You can now subtract $4 from $10 and have $6 left over but you can also do this as a single equation:
10 - (6 -2) = 6
The brackets are clarifying it but we don't really need them - you can write it as
10 - 6 - -2 = 6
To summarise: You have $10 (+10), you owe $6 (-6) minus the $2 (--2 = +2) you were forgiven so you have $6 left after you pay your friend back
You can also do this with physical objects as a practical demonstration.
Make a pile of blocks, take some away then take some out of the pile that is being taken away and give them back. The ones you take away are the single negative, the ones you give back again are the double negative
LostFerret t1_jee0bqw wrote
Reply to comment by TheBestMePlausible in eli5: Why do seemingly all battery powered electronics need at least 2 batteries? by OneGuyJeff
They do, 18650s range between 3 and 4 volts
GsTSaien t1_jee36y9 wrote
Reply to comment by Mitchelltrt in ELi5 If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? by cashmoneyhash
Holy shit