different molecular makeup. i’m pretty sure it’s because natural sugar crystals have stronger bonds between the molecules/ atoms which means your body has to expend energy to break them up and digest them, while processed and artificial sugars have their molecules very available to our systems so they go right through and don’t require extra energy to be broken up. another knock on effect (?) is because as well as artificial sugars in those foods, you’ll usually find a lot of flavourings, “bad” fats, and and other processed stuff, but in natural sugary foods you’ll find fibre, phytonutrients, protein and other things that your body has to work for to break down :)

My Samsung TV's remote has the batteries arranged vertically

>People can get addicted to anger and aggression because of it

yep, they're called football players, they get business degrees and run corporations

Right okay that makes sense. Hopefully this explains it for OP

When they’re brand new and in good shape, they’re not lossless, but they are about as good as you can get in the analog world. The problem is that the tapes are a physical media and will deteriorate over time. Or, even worse, they might get destroyed either by accident (like in a fire) or on purpose (like when they destroyed episodes from “Dr Who” and “the Tonight Show”).

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

• ELI5 requires that you search the ELI5 subreddit for your topic before posting. Users will often either find a thread that meets their needs or find that their question might qualify for an exception to rule 7. Please see this wiki entry for more details (Rule 7).

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

Better than crappy 80s cassettes yeah but not lossless. One of my favourite albums is Fresh by Sly and the Family Stone and that famously sounds a bit weird because apparently perfectionist Sly overdubbed so obsessively he wore the tape thin

Yeah, OP is actually correct that it's the field. If you have say a 700 kV power line, that means the voltage difference between the two lines is 700 kV. The laws of E&M mean that there has to be an electric field between the two lines, so if you took a charged particle from one line to the other, it would pick up a ton of energy. Incidentally, this is why working on high voltage lines is kind of intense, and the lines themselves have to be incredibly smooth (I think surface imperfections are micron scale or smaller to avoid coronal emission). It's the electric current moving through the field, both of which are provided by the generating station, which carry the energy. It's easy to forget that Maxwell's equations still apply to transmission lines, but they do!

To answer what I think is OP's question, classical magnetic fields don't do any work because the force is always perpendicular to the direction of motion, so the Earth's magnetic field doesn't do anything for power transmission. The Earth doesn't have a large scale electric field, because ions in the atmosphere would rapidly adjust to cancel it out. There aren't a lot of ions in the lower atmosphere (and again, transmission lines are very carefully designed to not create new ones), so the electric field doesn't get cancelled out and we can send power down the lines.

I believe oxytocin, the "love" chemical, also contributes to anger (or at least defensive behavior) against out-groups. The logic here being that you love your in-group so much you hate out-groups.

Source: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1189047

I assume those kinds of tapes have a lossless quality. Compared to those crappy cassettes I had in the 90s?

tape, if we're talking vinyl era

But what form did the original recordings take?

Simple google search.

Does space itself have energy?

Vacuum energy is an underlying background energy that exists in space throughout the entire Universe. The vacuum energy is a special case of zero-point energy that relates to the quantum vacuum.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy#:~:text=Vacuum%20energy%20is%20an%20underlying,relates%20to%20the%20quantum%20vacuum.

Also, look up quantum fields. These exist outside of space and time and are everywhere. So space, even going with metaphor that it is mostly nothing isn't all there is. There is a whole other realm of stuff. The consensus is in physics is that the universe emerged from quantum fields.

I recently saw a picture of the insides of a 9 volt battery and, guess what, it contained six AAA batteries.

Anger/rage is also a dopaminergic activity and that's why a lot of society now is addicted to anger and outrage, often fed by the 24 h news cycle

This can often be a problem as newer remixes often reduce the dynamic range in older pieces

Mastering can involve making a new transfer from original tapes (in hopes of getting a better starting point than the last transfer), but mainly it is sonic enhancements: noise reduction, EQ, and dynamic compression/expansion. Judicious use of these tools (not just turning all knobs to "11") can result in a more polished, modern sound that makes each song sound as good as it can (in the engineer's opinion); and it can smooth out inconsistencies from song to song (so everything on an album sounds like it belongs together). *Re-*mastering is just when someone does all this work again, often just for the sake of being able to market the same music again as "improved".

The ELI5 version is more like:

You know how your audio player has an "equalizer" or "tone controls" where you can change the volume of, say, just the bass and treble pitches in the music? When you mess with those settings, you are, in effect, "remastering" the audio as it plays. Well, someone did that (and a few other things) on every piece of recorded music you've ever heard, after it was created, to make sure it sounded really "good", in their opinion. This was "mastering" the audio. At some point, when the record company wanted to sell more copies, they got someone else to do that work again, and they marketed the result as "remastered", implying it sounds even better now. Whether it sounds different, and whether it is actually better, is often a matter of taste.

Source: I have done mixing and remastering work professionally.

Have you ever met a man?

There are different ways to achieve this and it's hard to say what you have seen. The "classical" and "easy" approach is to use vectors and apply rotation matrices. But for a flying device you often rotate around an arbitrary axis and not around x, y or z. That is where quarternions come in handy. They can represent a rotation around an arbitrary vector. But they are harder to understand so most teaching of those concepts is done the "classical" way. Quaternions are also numerically stable. Computers can only represent an approximation of a number (for example you can't store Pi, only the beginning). Using matrices it's happens more easily that an error introduced through these approximations changes your result a lot.

So articulate 👏 👏

Just marketing , grass fed animals can walk , run ? Roll around , gallop if they want - all of which improves muscle mass and tone but this takes land and good pasture which can be expensive , grain fed or the other hand - cattle are kept in feed lots with minimal room to walk , run , in general exercise so muscles atrophy become flabby and cattle just put on fat which you pay for in the weight , you think you are buying tasty meat but end up getting flabby loose meat and lots of fat. Fat can be tasty if it’s built on varied muscle and variety of grasses but corn just makes a yellowish tasteless fat Feed lots are good for profits but useless for anything else PROFITS FIRST! ITS THE AMERICAN WAY !!

Also: some mail clients (gmail, for example) will add an unsubscribe option when they detect something that appears to be from a mailing list. That might be what you're noticing.

Denaturation - proteins require a specific shape to function. Alcohol can alter that shape and make them useless. Bacteria rely on the products that proteins make and die due to lack of those products.

>Is there a scientific explanation for why the two are separated in lifestock feed advertising or is it just marketing?

Because they're wildly different in appearance and nutritional content

Grass and Hay are both very bulky but not very nutrient rich, that's why cows have 4 stomachs to help them break down grass and get the nutrients

Grain is wayyy denser in nutrients. A pound of grass hay has about 900 calories for the cow but a pound of feed corn has about 1500 calories, and corn is about 3x denser than hay so the same volume of corn contains about 5x the amount of calories making it a lot easier to fatten up a cow off grains like corn than just grass

The cow is going to eat until its stomach feels full. If you're feeding it grain then its going to eat a lot more calories and pack on a lot more fat than if you were just feeding it low density hay

When people talk about grain fed, I think they really mean corn fed. There is a difference in grass fed vs corn fed. Corn fed is actually less healthy for the cow because they are not supposed to eat corn, they can have bacteria in their body and that bacteria gets on the meat during slaughter/butchering. This is why some livestock gets antibiotics, to counteract the bacteria. So they say grass fed is better, but there is a change in the way fat is stored / distributed in the body when they eat corn vs grass, and this has an impact on how the food tastes / the cut of meat.