I found an old book from the 70s that used this sort of language. It was weird.

[deleted]

It's an astroterfed 4chan phrase from years ago to try and frame LGBT as potentially more accepting of pedos.

I feel like it's a missed opportunity for journalists to ask for an evaluation of Elon as CEO...

Then why does every single important person on the planet use it?

Finally a CEO giving the media the attention it deserves (none).

Just proof there's no end to tribalism, even amongst the victims of it.

I mean, it's twitter. It has never been an important platform. They are just casting aside the illusion that getting retweeted three thousand times will make your dreams come true

Okay, but did they find him?

That's been their main line of attack for the better part of the last 8 years. I don't know why they confuse us with preists and southern Baptist ministers...

>“minor-attracted persons”

Are they really saying that about trans people?

What would the expression be for taking away their ability to bill taxpayers for the lawsuits they settle for negligence, violence etc?

Consistency is important for a brand

Apparently they didn't understand why I had to include the /s

This is hilarious!! 😂😆🏳️‍⚧️

No for the minimising paedophilia when a woman does it.

BUTT TO FACE

[removed]

Allocating less money… defunding.

So Hilary Ronen is a boot locker too, right?

He goes about it in a dumb way, but I do get the general idea of what he is doing... The theory being that he does not need to communicate things directly to media requests, because he can address them directly to the public through social media.

And whenever I read articles about some controversial thing around a company it either ends with "we have reached out but not heard back", or some canned response, clearly carefully crafted by the PR department. They typically do not add much of value.

I suppose it worked well enough for Tesla, and so he wants to apply it here. But Twitter is a different beast from Tesla, I'm not so sure he'll be happy with the results in the long term. He losses that buffer. That carefully crafted message that would get tacked on to every news article about the current controversy. Maybe he thinks those articles will instead include a tweet by him on whatever it is, but he is constantly putting his foot in his mouth.

Anyways, I guess I think it's a pretty bad move for him to make, but I do not think it is one that's going to harm the public in any way. PR is literally only there so the company can put out their version of the story. It never really gives any insight, just a spin.

If they zoom in really, really far they can examine the chromosomes. It's a TERF superpower.

Now do Ferdinand Demara and “The Great Impostor.” Sounds like although some suspected his claims, there was mostly truth, enough to follow him around and make his life difficult. There was a book that vouched for him.

Of course... even the cats are all bottoms.

Nah, it's still FTP because they'll always protect property over people