Recent comments in /f/space
gg_account t1_jdxenq8 wrote
Reply to James Webb Space Telescope finds no atmosphere on Earth-like TRAPPIST-1 exoplanet by locus_towers
This is actually pretty puzzling. B was thought to have the thickest atmosphere of all the planets because of its low apparent density. This could mean all the planets have underestimated densities, or maybe their composition on a whole is very different from our solar system.
McFoogles t1_jdxdg4p wrote
Attention K2 readers: Learn the one secret K1 Civilizations don’t want you to know!
Anthony_Pelchat t1_jdxdb7k wrote
Reply to comment by binary_spaniard in Rocket Lab targets $50 million launch price for Neutron rocket to challenge SpaceX’s Falcon 9 by cnbc_official
Btw, I was under the impression that Starship couldn't do GTO missions while being reused and would need a refueling mission or kick stage. Apparently that is not the case. According to SpaceX's Starship User Guide, they can put 21t into GTO while still recovering the booster and upper stage at the launch site.
By comparison, Falcon Heavy can only put 26.7t into GTO while being fully expended. And the heaviest payload to GTO so far (by SpaceX) is only 7t, according to SpaceXStats webpage. And it appears that the heaviest payload ever by SpaceX is only 17.4t back in January, according to SpaceFlightNow.
wombat5003 t1_jdxd0wo wrote
Reply to Are galaxies just giant accretion disks around super massive black holes? by darthvadercock
I was reading the other day, and it was also verified by how the universe works (but don’t quote me exactly) that a galaxy is interconnected not just by gravity, but also magnetically through magnetic fields that interconnect everything…. So someone smarter than myself please explain that more, but that was the general gist… please forgive I think it’s basically the hardest thing to get your head around :) you know I took a small course on quantum computing recently and the concepts of quantum in relation to the universe is so hard to comprehend when you start getting down to sub atomic levels…
EarwaxWizard t1_jdxcx4o wrote
Reply to comment by Nerull in Are galaxies just giant accretion disks around super massive black holes? by darthvadercock
Not to mention the dark matter that helps keep the galaxy together (gravitationally)
hooptyboots18 t1_jdxcamt wrote
Reply to Photo of the comet Hale-Bopp above a tree on 29 March 1997. Wikipedia Picture of the day on May 27, 2008. Source Wikipedia. by Aeromarine_eng
That’s the one that all of those people ate poison pudding and died so they could get on the comet and fly home.
[deleted] t1_jdxca8e wrote
Reply to comment by EarthSolar in [NASAWebb] TRAPPIST-1 b: We give it a one (M-dwarf) star review; it lacks atmosphere. Webb found the dayside temperature of this rocky exoplanet to be about 450º F (227º C) — suggesting it has no significant atmosphere by Easy_Money_
I mean it is one planet out of quadrillion but yes I get what you're saying it's making people afraid that the most abundant planets around red type Stars where most life in the universe will have a chance to live for the longest period of time it's scaring people that the Stars may be violent and may strip atmosphere and there may not be as much chance for life in the universe as a result but still I would caution that it's literally one planet
tom21g t1_jdxb72s wrote
Reply to comment by turtlechef in Everyone talks about how huge Andromeda will look in the sky billions of years from now. I present you what the Milky Way *currently* looks like in the skies of our neighbor, the Large Magellanic Cloud. We appear absolutely huge in their skies! [Simulated view] by lampiaio
A) good info!
B) homework now is to do a search for starry skies in the Southern hemisphere that show the Magellanic Cloud
Thanks for answering
EarwaxWizard t1_jdxaie4 wrote
Reply to This is what 7 minutes of exposure time looks like on a dark, moonless night at Zabriskie Point, Death Valley (USA)! by peeweekid
If I had the money, this is the kind of stuff I would do.
Hot_Egg5840 t1_jdxa692 wrote
Reply to comment by ForceUser128 in Webb Telescope confirms nearby rocky planet has no atmosphere by hemlockfuture
Disco ball?
ThrowawayPhysicist1 t1_jdx8ewv wrote
Reply to comment by sight19 in Black holes may be swallowing invisible matter that slows the movement of stars by trevor25
This is a good explanation but there’s also just the simpler fact that if things can’t collide (and dark matter is mostly collisionless as famously seen in the bullet cluster) it’s hard to get it to “stick together”. So while gravitational force will get it form “dense halos” it’s fairly unlikely you’ll get something like planets or stars.
gg_account t1_jdx6o50 wrote
Reply to comment by nmfpriv in James Webb Space Telescope finds no atmosphere on Earth-like TRAPPIST-1 exoplanet by locus_towers
Closest planet to star, so most transits, so most data to analyze.
gg_account t1_jdx6fuh wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in James Webb Space Telescope finds no atmosphere on Earth-like TRAPPIST-1 exoplanet by locus_towers
They modeled several scenarios and this temperature almost exactly matches an airless black rock.
Nerull t1_jdx5z5i wrote
Reply to Are galaxies just giant accretion disks around super massive black holes? by darthvadercock
No, the black hole is an essentially insignificant portion of the galaxies entire mass. The galaxy is orbiting it's own collective mass not the black hole.
For reference, Sag A* is about 0.0007% of our galaxies mass. It's gravitational attraction on our solar system is completely insignificant compared to the rest of the galaxies mass.
Our solar system orbits the galaxy at about 230000 m/s. Sag A*'s escape velocity at our orbital radius is about 2090 m/s. If the rest of the galaxy vanished, we would go flying out into intergalactic space, since we aren't even close to being gravitationally bound to the black hole.
Half-Borg t1_jdx5wv9 wrote
Reply to Are galaxies just giant accretion disks around super massive black holes? by darthvadercock
No. Galaxies and their black holes form together.
trustych0rds t1_jdx5wv8 wrote
Reply to Are galaxies just giant accretion disks around super massive black holes? by darthvadercock
No, since the black holes themselves don't generally have anywhere near the gravitational attraction to bind all of the galaxy's matter gravitationally itself.
Half-Borg t1_jdx5rza wrote
Reply to comment by mytauntmissed in Are we getting wider? by 3yoshikageKira3
The expansion speed is also constant across the space dimensions. Which is a bit strange, because that breaks the speed of light limit.
IntentoDeAstronauta t1_jdx5nmk wrote
Reply to Are galaxies just giant accretion disks around super massive black holes? by darthvadercock
Not all galaxies have super massive black goles.
I-melted t1_jdx4v8a wrote
Reply to Are galaxies just giant accretion disks around super massive black holes? by darthvadercock
I want to know this too. Things have changed since I was at school.
kayak_enjoyer t1_jdx3teh wrote
Shit. Send a message to that ship we dispatched 20 years ago. Tell them to turn around. Oh, boy are they in for a rude surprise if this message doesn't reach them in time. 😬
iwoodificood t1_jdx3o2s wrote
Reply to comment by TransporterError in James Webb Space Telescope finds no atmosphere on Earth-like TRAPPIST-1 exoplanet by locus_towers
Why bother with a dyson swarm when you can get perfect utilization of energy with an antimatter engine.
chessrevolt t1_jdx2x71 wrote
Reply to comment by ForceUser128 in Webb Telescope confirms nearby rocky planet has no atmosphere by hemlockfuture
At least ssk the planet out first!
AncientProduce t1_jdx2ful wrote
Reply to comment by cheeyipe in Everyone talks about how huge Andromeda will look in the sky billions of years from now. I present you what the Milky Way *currently* looks like in the skies of our neighbor, the Large Magellanic Cloud. We appear absolutely huge in their skies! [Simulated view] by lampiaio
Maybe you need to rub some crystals!
HeebieMcJeeberson t1_jdx1mxl wrote
Reply to comment by ferrel_hadley in If earth was a smooth sphere, which direction would water flow when placed on the surface? by Axial-Precession
Mom: "How do you like your new shirt?"
ferrel_hadley: "For a start it's not new if I'm already wearing it."
Mom: "Go to your room."
Euphoric_Station_763 t1_jdxeqev wrote
Reply to comment by peeweekid in This is what 7 minutes of exposure time looks like on a dark, moonless night at Zabriskie Point, Death Valley (USA)! by peeweekid
I’m actually talking about shutter speed. Like holding it open Long enough with aid of a tripod to accumulate time and light so that it can be burned onto film to where you can see things that can’t be seen at the speed of light by the naked eye. But I’m just a time traveler from 1977.