Recent comments in /f/space
[deleted] t1_je128st wrote
Reply to comment by Nemo_Shadows in Could Hawking radiation coming from black holes be the same as the dark energy accelerating expansion of the universe? by Rskingen
[removed]
larsschellhas OP t1_je11s3v wrote
Reply to comment by EnigoMontoya in Is Space-Based Solar Power An Option to Solve Humanity's Energy Hunger After All? by larsschellhas
That there are only around 10-50 km of atmosphere is the way and that accuracy is the primary driver of losses. :)
[deleted] t1_je11nv7 wrote
[removed]
WashUrShorts t1_je11k53 wrote
Reply to comment by npearson in Water is trapped in glass beads on the moon's surface, lunar samples show by SaraShane
This makes actually a lot of sense,thanks mate
EnigoMontoya t1_je11jm3 wrote
Reply to comment by larsschellhas in Is Space-Based Solar Power An Option to Solve Humanity's Energy Hunger After All? by larsschellhas
Right so the conversion is 50% but the transmission over distance is a distinct loss correct? Yes, microwaves can penetrate the atmosphere, but there is still a cost.
https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2352484720317273-gr9.jpg
This diagram from a 2021 study touting a 45% conversion efficiency but notes a huge drop from the transmission... 400 KW -> 10 KW over just 10 KM.
When you consider geosynchronous orbit is all the way out at 35,000 KM. This seems like a major issue. What am I missing?
npearson t1_je11f23 wrote
Reply to comment by WashUrShorts in Water is trapped in glass beads on the moon's surface, lunar samples show by SaraShane
The samples brought back from the Moon were stored in vessels that had rubber o-rings. The sharp lunar dust compromised the o-rings and the samples were contaminated by Earth's atmosphere so scientists were never sure if the water they were seeing in Apollo samples was due to contamination or water that was originally from the Moon.
[deleted] t1_je11dvi wrote
Reply to comment by nicspace1 in Heads up: Five planets set to line up in night sky this week by davster39
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je10yqi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_je10j94 wrote
Reply to comment by VikingSlayer in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
[removed]
Nemo_Shadows t1_je10ac0 wrote
Reply to Could Hawking radiation coming from black holes be the same as the dark energy accelerating expansion of the universe? by Rskingen
Partly YES, I think it is a release valve of sorts the higher the output the closer the Black Hole is getting to that tipping point of becoming a galaxy, which can be any size depending on the amounts of energy contained within, as the universe is like a heartbeat where energy is always wrapping and unwrapping so it is Space that is actually expanding because space is energy and that energy is everything else unwrapping into it and then it gets rewrapped via Black Holes.
Endless Energy System A.K.A Perpetual Energy, as energy cannot be created or destroyed only changed and I also think we know or see only a small part of something that is truly endless and infinite in size however the internal workings of the Universe across the entire spectrum of it are definable and knowable and therefore understandable by any and all willing to see it as it is rather than what they would wish it to be.
N. Shadows
cfdeveloper t1_je0zt4r wrote
Reply to comment by Ken_from_Barbie in Heads up: Five planets set to line up in night sky this week by davster39
with a name like "Ken_from_Barbie", I would have expected you to get the joke.
edit: it seems I was the one who didn't get the joke. (I don't tend to click on profiles for research)
mikehawk1979 t1_je0z940 wrote
Maybe that’s because its Tuesday? Probably better at the weekend
[deleted] t1_je0ys6p wrote
Reply to comment by NotYetSoonEnough in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
[removed]
larsschellhas OP t1_je0yqpt wrote
Reply to comment by Psychomadeye in Is Space-Based Solar Power An Option to Solve Humanity's Energy Hunger After All? by larsschellhas
Probably easier to throw a small rock against the asteroids early on in their trajectory though :D
larsschellhas OP t1_je0yixx wrote
Reply to comment by Psychomadeye in Is Space-Based Solar Power An Option to Solve Humanity's Energy Hunger After All? by larsschellhas
I feel like you are oversimplifying things. 🤔
Ken_from_Barbie t1_je0yhlw wrote
Reply to comment by cfdeveloper in Heads up: Five planets set to line up in night sky this week by davster39
I'm married bro. Check out my Instagram
k-laz t1_je0yesl wrote
Reply to comment by NotYetSoonEnough in More Water Found on Moon, Locked in Tiny Glass Beads by LanceOhio
I found this source suggesting 22 million gallons annually.
https://www.qwet.net/blog/trapped-water-in-plastic-water-bottles-is-a-very-real-problem
It's on the internet, so it must be true.
larsschellhas OP t1_je0yd9s wrote
Reply to comment by EnigoMontoya in Is Space-Based Solar Power An Option to Solve Humanity's Energy Hunger After All? by larsschellhas
It's around 50% at the moment, but has no physical limit really. The advantage of microwaves (like Radar) is that they are much less impacted by clouds and weather than visible light.
The receiver stations are also simple antennas which can be manufactured much cheaper than solar PV, therefore making up only a small share of the total CAPEX. I don't have the number off the top of my head, but they can be found in the Roland Berger and Frazer Nash studies.
Psychomadeye t1_je0ycm3 wrote
Reply to comment by larsschellhas in Is Space-Based Solar Power An Option to Solve Humanity's Energy Hunger After All? by larsschellhas
When I think of space lasers I think about using them to deflect asteroids. It would be kind of cool to beam them down to earth for power, but right now it's definitely not worth it. We could probably get the most bang for our buck by saving power.
larsschellhas OP t1_je0xv97 wrote
Reply to comment by Psychomadeye in Is Space-Based Solar Power An Option to Solve Humanity's Energy Hunger After All? by larsschellhas
True, I'd love some death beams, too! 🤣
Psychomadeye t1_je0xsem wrote
Reply to Is Space-Based Solar Power An Option to Solve Humanity's Energy Hunger After All? by larsschellhas
This doesn't feel like the right place for this. But to answer your question, no.
The_Masturbatician t1_je0xre7 wrote
Reply to comment by WalkingDeadHiker in NASA Seeks (College) Student Solutions for Managing Moon Landing Dust Cloud. by Aeromarine_eng
i meant it jest. leave those old guys alone
3SquirrelsinaCoat t1_je0xlzh wrote
Reply to Could Hawking radiation coming from black holes be the same as the dark energy accelerating expansion of the universe? by Rskingen
If black holes (of any size) are local "objects" (in as much as they are in one spot, not all spots), then logically unknown energy that causes expansion in all places at the same time at the same rate (to our knowledge) cannot come from an astrological body that only exists in one place.
Plus, as u/Chadmartigan says, we actually understand Hawking radiation. Dark energy we do not understand at all.
cfdeveloper t1_je0xf42 wrote
Reply to comment by Ken_from_Barbie in Heads up: Five planets set to line up in night sky this week by davster39
Hit up a toy store, you are likely to find the perfect lady.
wanted_to_upvote t1_je12l42 wrote
Reply to Could Hawking radiation coming from black holes be the same as the dark energy accelerating expansion of the universe? by Rskingen
There is nothing really special about radiation itself in Hawking radiation. Is is just photons like other forms of electromagnetic radiation. It is only unique in the way it is produced at the event horizon of a black hole. It arises from the steady conversion of quantum vacuum fluctuations into pairs of particles, one of which escaping at infinity while the other is trapped inside the black hole horizon.