Recent comments in /f/technology
Gold_Rush69 t1_je5chts wrote
Reply to comment by FISHING_100000000000 in US hands China easy PR win with TikTok show by HorrorCharacter5127
Literally the same thing they replied to my original comment with.
Me: China has concentration camps.
Them: responds with link to incarceration stats
Wwize t1_je5cgin wrote
Reply to comment by WeimarRepublic in U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022 by altmorty
Why? Fossil fuels and nuclear get subsidies too. They get much bigger subsidies. You also seem to be unaware that we have a major crisis with climate change and we need to build renewable energy as fast as possible, so even though it is cheaper, it is in our best interest to subsidize it anyway so we can build it faster. We should stop subsidizing fossil fuels though.
AntifaDoesntExist t1_je5br3y wrote
Reply to comment by trevize1138 in U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022 by altmorty
these same pricks would be the ones who would thump their chest about nuclear and how "safe" waste storage is.
[deleted] t1_je5b154 wrote
[deleted] t1_je5ayw9 wrote
WeimarRepublic t1_je5ax6i wrote
Reply to comment by Wwize in U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022 by altmorty
>The market has spoken and it's saying renewable energy is the future. There's no way any other energy source can compete.
Cool, can we end the subsidies then
Walesish t1_je5awhe wrote
Hmm not sure I believe that! The settings are still hidden.
spectre1210 t1_je5auf2 wrote
Reply to comment by Teftell in US hands China easy PR win with TikTok show by HorrorCharacter5127
RemindMe! 2 years
spectre1210 t1_je5arhx wrote
Reply to comment by Teftell in US hands China easy PR win with TikTok show by HorrorCharacter5127
I also get all my news analysis from Twitter and social media lol.
Gold_Rush69 t1_je5ahzy wrote
Reply to comment by atwegotsidetrekked in US hands China easy PR win with TikTok show by HorrorCharacter5127
You’re the one who started the whataboutism by responding to my criticism of China’s concentration camps with incarceration statistics.
“better then China, low bar”
That was literally my original point.
SBBurzmali t1_je5af9u wrote
Reply to comment by ShallowFreakingValue in Apple sued for allegedly firing, threatening union organizers by Loki-L
It's the latest hustle, work for a giant company, join a union, stop working, get fired, sue for the company's "anti-union activities" and hope for a quick settlement.
Teftell t1_je59zg1 wrote
Reply to comment by spectre1210 in US hands China easy PR win with TikTok show by HorrorCharacter5127
I can use VPN, visit restricted sites without a threat of being jailed for 10 years or going bankrupt, will you be able to say the same in a near future?
JoeFro0 t1_je59m8w wrote
RESTRICTS ACT also known as the tiktok ban is effectively Banning Free Speech, First Amendment, actual Journalism.
Read the RESTRICTS ACT here:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/686/text?format=txt&r=15&s=1
Priority Information and Communications Technology Areas.--In carrying out sections 3 and 4, the Secretary shall prioritize evaluation of--
(1) information and communications technology products or services used by a party to a covered transaction in a sector designated as critical infrastructure in Policy Directive 21 (February 12, 2013; relating to critical infrastructure security and resilience);
(2) software, hardware, or any other product or service integral to telecommunications products and services, including-- (A) wireless local area networks; (B) mobile networks; (C) satellite payloads; (D) satellite operations and control; (E) cable access points; (F) wireline access points; (G) core networking systems; (H) long-, short-, and back-haul networks; or (I) edge computer platforms;
(3) any software, hardware, or any other product or service integral to data hosting or computing service that uses, processes, or retains, or is expected to use, process, or retain, sensitive personal data with respect to greater than 1,000,000 persons in the United States at any point during the year period preceding the date on which the covered transaction is referred to the Secretary for review or the Secretary initiates review of the covered transaction, including-- (A) internet hosting services; (B) cloud-based or distributed computing and data storage; (C) machine learning, predictive analytics, and data science products and services, including those involving the provision of services to assist a party utilize, manage, or maintain open-source software; (D) managed services; and (E) content delivery services;
(4) internet- or network-enabled sensors, webcams, end- point surveillance or monitoring devices, modems and home networking devices if greater than 1,000,000 units have been sold to persons in the United States at any point during the year period preceding the date on which the covered transaction is referred to the Secretary for review or the Secretary initiates review of the covered transaction;
(5) unmanned vehicles, including drones and other aerials systems, autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles, or any other product or service integral to the provision, maintenance, or management of such products or services;
(6) software designed or used primarily for connecting with and communicating via the internet that is in use by greater than 1,000,000 persons in the United States at any point during the year period preceding the date on which the covered transaction is referred to the Secretary for review or the Secretary initiates review of the covered transaction, including-- (A) desktop applications; (B) mobile applications; (C) gaming applications; (D) payment applications; or (E) web-based applications; or
(7) information and communications technology products and services integral to-- (A) artificial intelligence and machine learning; (B) quantum key distribution; (C) quantum communications; (D) quantum computing; (E) post-quantum cryptography; (F) autonomous systems; (G) advanced robotics; (H) biotechnology; (I) synthetic biology; (J) computational biology; and (K) e-commerce technology and services, including any electronic techniques for accomplishing business transactions, online retail, internet-enabled logistics, internet-enabled payment technology, and online marketplaces. (b) Considerations Relating to Undue and Unacceptable Risks.--In determining whether a covered transaction poses an undue or unacceptable risk under section 3(a) or 4(a), the Secretary-- (1) shall, as the Secretary determines appropriate and in consultation with appropriate agency heads, consider, where available-- (A) any removal or exclusion order issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, or the Director of National Intelligence pursuant to recommendations of the Federal Acquisition Security Council pursuant to section 1323 of title 41, United States Code; (B) any order or license revocation issued by the Federal Communications Commission with respect to a transacting party, or any consent decree imposed by the Federal Trade Commission with respect to a transacting party; (C) any relevant provision of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and the respective supplements to those regulations; (D) any actual or potential threats to the execution of a national critical function identified by the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency; (E) the nature, degree, and likelihood of consequence to the public and private sectors of the United States that would occur if vulnerabilities of the information and communications technologies services supply chain were to be exploited; and (F) any other source of information that the Secretary determines appropriate; and (2) may consider, where available, any relevant threat assessment or report prepared by the Director of National Intelligence completed or conducted at the request of the Secretary. SEC. 6. DESIGNATION OF FOREIGN ADVERSARIES. (a) In General.-- (1) Designation.--The Secretary may, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, designate any foreign government or regime as a foreign adversary if the Secretary finds that the foreign government or regime is engaged in a long-term pattern or serious instances of conduct significantly adverse to the national security of the United States or security and safety of United States persons. (2) Removal of designation.--The Secretary may, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, remove the designation of any foreign government or regime as a foreign adversary, including any foreign government or regime identified in section 2(8), if the Secretary finds that the foreign government or regime is no longer engaged in a long- term pattern or serious instances of conduct significantly adverse to the national or economic security of the United States or security and safety of United States persons in a manner that would warrant designation as a foreign adversary. (b) Notice.--Not later than 15 days before the date on which the Secretary makes or removes a designation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall, by classified communication, notify the President pro tempore, Majority Leader, and Minority Leader of the Senate, the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and the relevant committees of Congress, in writing, of the intent to designate a foreign government or regime as a foreign adversary under this section, together with the findings made under subsection (a) with respect to the foreign government or regime and the factual basis therefor.
RESTRICTS ACT
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/686/text?format=txt&r=15&s=1
OriginalCompetitive t1_je59bnu wrote
Reply to comment by Justtryme90 in U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022 by altmorty
Gas is a lot better than coal. Only half the CO2 and almost no other pollutants.
GrowFreeFood t1_je59bfa wrote
Reply to comment by buckyworld in U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022 by altmorty
Huh?
trevize1138 t1_je598jt wrote
Reply to comment by _WardenoftheWest_ in U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022 by altmorty
It's easy to feel all wise-to-the-game having your "wake up, sheeple!" moment when you're only arguing against the strawmen you created.
dirtroad207 t1_je594jz wrote
Reply to comment by noorbeast in US hands China easy PR win with TikTok show by HorrorCharacter5127
Yeah I mean China can already buy most of the data tracked through tiktok anyway.
OriginalCompetitive t1_je58whu wrote
Reply to comment by Tearakan in U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022 by altmorty
By humanity, you mean China. Emissions have been dropping for years in the U.S. and EU.
HildemarTendler t1_je58uxf wrote
Reply to comment by Cyclops_roxx in Apple sued for allegedly firing, threatening union organizers by Loki-L
How does one arrest a corporation?
trevize1138 t1_je58eal wrote
Reply to comment by Internal-Test-8015 in U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022 by altmorty
I know people like to say "EVs won't do much to curb climate change" but the rise of renewables owes a lot to the rise of EVs. Tech advances in batteries and a major ramp up in battery production and supply is a major ripple effect. It's like how oil's dominance as an energy source helped create products like polymers and all variety of synthetic products.
I dare say we would not have such a dramatic rise in renewable energy without the corresponding rise in EVs. That put it over the top from "I guess this is what we have to do but we won't like it" to "holy crap! I gotta get in on the ground floor of this renewable gold rush."
Lorddon1234 t1_je58d9t wrote
Reply to comment by Higuy54321 in US hands China easy PR win with TikTok show by HorrorCharacter5127
Wait, Fox News is actually against banning Tik Tok???
Living-blech t1_je58967 wrote
Reply to comment by roflmaolz in US hands China easy PR win with TikTok show by HorrorCharacter5127
Quite bold of you to assume the majority of Americans know what the Patriot act is, let alone what the outcome was. That's half the outcome of the Patriot act...
8ew8135 t1_je586yo wrote
Reply to comment by myowngalactus in Twitter will no longer recommend tweets from unverified accounts, blocks non-Blue users from voting in polls by KingBlue2
Only Musk will be able to participate in polls soon (to protect the integrity of the vote)
8ew8135 t1_je583jf wrote
Reply to Twitter will no longer recommend tweets from unverified accounts, blocks non-Blue users from voting in polls by KingBlue2
Actually I heard this is just another step towards Musk’s final goal where only he will be able to vote in online polls (to protect the integrity of the vote of course)
Diknak t1_je5cnfi wrote
Reply to comment by WeimarRepublic in U.S. renewable electricity surpassed coal in 2022 by altmorty
if you want to remove coal and gas subsidies too...it's not like renewables are the only energy subsidies. Hell, the oil industry is the most subsidized industry on the planet.