Recent comments in /f/technology
weaselmaster t1_jearofl wrote
Reply to comment by thejikz in Aptera’s Solar-Powered EV Is Finally Finished—and It Looks Just as Bonkers as the Concept by elister
Bate?
TomUngerfeld t1_jearm6b wrote
Reply to comment by SlowMotionPanic in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
Oh, I see. Thanks. For those that don't know, Blodget is the CEO and editor-in-chief of Business Insider.
MenWhoStareAtBoats t1_jearkfy wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
Ah, I see now. You don’t understand what words mean.
Fred2620 t1_jearelv wrote
Reply to comment by redyellowblue5031 in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
> by removing the a majority of checks and balances in more conventional slower forms of money transfer.
But then again, there's a reason why these checks and balances exist in the first place.
dratseb t1_jear860 wrote
Reply to comment by Dwarfdeaths in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
False equivalency, but I don’t feel like getting into it right now. Have a good day!
[deleted] t1_jear5jh wrote
Reply to comment by Affectionate_Can7987 in Reddit cracked down on revenge porn, creepshots with twofold spike in permabans by thawingSumTendies
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jear21m wrote
[deleted] t1_jeaqzyc wrote
Reply to comment by lordargent in Microsoft promises it’s made Teams less confusing by unnamedprydonian
[deleted]
JayCroghan t1_jeaqzbq wrote
Reply to comment by marketrent in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
I’m not sure Fintech has a fraud issue, Cash App has a fraud issue. Head over to the Revolut sub and see the countless people posting about their accounts frozen. I bet Cash App doesn’t have that issue. I work in FinTech and it’s amazing how much KYC and AML goes on. Cash App seems to not bother with that which is why it isn’t in Europe because it’d be ran out again.
[deleted] t1_jeaqqom wrote
Reply to comment by turtlepowerpizzatime in Reddit cracked down on revenge porn, creepshots with twofold spike in permabans by thawingSumTendies
[deleted]
random125184 t1_jeaqq6z wrote
Reply to comment by Pdb12345 in Reddit cracked down on revenge porn, creepshots with twofold spike in permabans by thawingSumTendies
Lol pretty much. And spoiler alert: >!She’s not really his stepmom!<
SlowMotionPanic t1_jeaqps5 wrote
Reply to comment by gansmaltz in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
> True, bitcoins are resilient for crypto, but why is it that, proportionally, so many of its users are scammers?
How do you know so many use it for illegal purposes—specifically scams? Over 1 million people own at least some Bitcoin. Most of its use is for investment, which is why wallet activity is chronically low. People buy and hold it like gold or any other asset they think will appreciate.
>I can’t think of many situations where digital dollars would fail where Bitcoin is even accessible much less a useful medium of exchange where cash wouldnt be more useful. >
- That doesn’t have anything to do with the claims that a disproportionate number of Bitcoin users are scammers.
- People don’t necessarily get into Bitcoin because they think a fiat currency is going to fail. They hold it like an investment because it tends to appreciate over time.
- Bitcoin’s strength has never had to shine thankfully. That is, governments you and I live under haven’t failed and experienced currency collapse. But, for an example here, it is cheaper and much faster for me to convert cash into Bitcoin and hold in my wallet and travel internationally than engage an international wire transfer. There’s risk involved, of course. But one thing I don’t risk is having any cash I’m traveling with summarily seized without any recourse. I don’t have to worry about my government turning fascist and freezing my accounts to prevent me from leaving. It’s a hedge, like any decent investment.
> > Bitcoin wants to be the dollar bill of the internet but it can’t even remain anonymous.
What an odd pivot. The USD isn’t even anonymous unless you pay in cash. Bitcoin was never founded to be anonymous. It was founded to be a trustless system with a fixed amount of currency. It cracks me up that so many people in this thread are asserting that Bitcoin is private which is why criminals use it, when it is ridiculously easy to track transactions. People even put watches on wallets for fun to write articles about dormant wallets becoming active again, and the world governments have caught criminals when they try to use or move funds after a crime, even years later, because it is all part of the public ledger.
And our bank accounts are equally not private. Bitcoin is at best pseudo anonymous because of how it spawns various wallets by default and doesn’t have a central database of users to lookup real world info about.
>By design every transaction becomes part of the blockchain for everyone, right?
Yes, that’s how it remains trustless and secure. Do you know my bank account number? No? Do you know my Bitcoin wallet address? I could send a payment right now and use a one-time wallet. This isn’t as big of an argument as you think. If anything, it disproves that Bitcoin is an attractive target for criminals because it isn’t truly anonymous. You have workarounds at best.
Dwarfdeaths t1_jeaqnvx wrote
Reply to comment by dratseb in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
Who are "original owners"? Ultimately someone just found some land and put a flag on it. Even natives who have been living in a place for thousands of years are still just using land they didn't make. We either have to agree that all humans have equal claim to the earth by virtue of existing, or accept the arbitrary acquisition of land by whomever can hold it for a sufficient period.
The "equal sharing" solution is known as the land value tax.
[deleted] t1_jeaqm10 wrote
Reply to comment by Pdb12345 in Reddit cracked down on revenge porn, creepshots with twofold spike in permabans by thawingSumTendies
[deleted]
Tyre_blanket t1_jeaql23 wrote
Reply to comment by Iwantmyflag in Apple sued for allegedly firing, threatening union organizers by Loki-L
Not only “paid shills” are anti union.
zibdabo t1_jeaqi8a wrote
Anyone has the full article?
Pdb12345 t1_jeaq7xn wrote
Reply to comment by random125184 in Reddit cracked down on revenge porn, creepshots with twofold spike in permabans by thawingSumTendies
it seems like everything except stepmoms was banned
dratseb t1_jeappi8 wrote
Reply to comment by Dwarfdeaths in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
You mean the land that was stolen from it’s original owners? Yeah, we shouldn’t pay rent for that lol
[deleted] t1_jeapoug wrote
Reply to comment by MenWhoStareAtBoats in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
[deleted]
tom-8-to t1_jeap8zc wrote
Well, at least the fraud is with real money, money that is moving thru, and flowing, from one end to the other.
But lord help us, if instead of cash it was all crypto.
MenWhoStareAtBoats t1_jeap1bb wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
I don’t think anyone here has any idea what it is that you think you are trying to say.
Amarellih t1_jeaorfm wrote
Reply to comment by UnpopularBastard in Reddit cracked down on revenge porn, creepshots with twofold spike in permabans by thawingSumTendies
Amen brother! ☝️
albanywairoa t1_jeaodg9 wrote
Lol why the hell is anybody still using FB an Twitter anyway?
[deleted] t1_jeaobly wrote
Reply to comment by MenWhoStareAtBoats in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jearoo2 wrote
Reply to comment by RobloxLover369421 in Reddit cracked down on revenge porn, creepshots with twofold spike in permabans by thawingSumTendies
[removed]