What's with Ethicists and their hard-on for censorship, or censorship adjacent topics.

"Ban the pen, someone could a write lies with it!" "God forbid someone can now use a computer to write lies faster than they could with a pen".

What a joke.

> I will complain if I don't agree with it.

Well not on Reddit you won’t 🤷‍♂️

> Whether you like it or not. You seem to have a fixation with my compliance to your views.

No, just with the TOS

> It's not healthy to fixate on people's compliance like that.

Source?

> It'll make it hard to learn to get along with others.

And I want that because..?

> I suggest a hobby, or getting a pet. They are easy to control. 🤔 Either way, best of luck to you!

Thanks, I guess

So, it doesn’t matter whether a car is a potential safety hazard; or, whether Insurance companies have a habit of totaling every wrecked car of this design.

I will complain if I don't agree with it. Whether you like it or not. You seem to have a fixation with my compliance to your views. It's not healthy to fixate on people's compliance like that. It'll make it hard to learn to get along with others. I suggest a hobby, or getting a pet. They are easy to control. 🤔 Either way, best of luck to you!

Why?

Yeah I know. Exactly why I asked since I’m not too sure how reliable AI was ten years ago.

>In the real world, there is more to practical design than aerodynamic efficiency.

There literally is nothing more practical than aerodynamic efficiency when the intent of the car is to maximize driving distance per watt hour. Literally not a single thing more practical. Not one.

Edit: Lol, you threw a little pout and blocked me over this. What a thin skinned crybaby. No wonder you freak out over nonsense. They always love to throw out their little last whine before they block too. So cliché.

I stopped reading when the whinging never seemed to end.

[removed]

Then don’t complain if you get banned for breaking TOS🤷‍♂️

I live and drive in the real world. In the real world, there is more to practical design than aerodynamic efficiency.

Another responder said it will have a rear-facing camera, an essential safety feature that you omitted.

I mean as an admin I tend to agree about the incomprehensibly of azure ad and the 29 other control panels Microsoft asks admins to manage. I will say that while the UI is shit, the vertical integration of an all windows environment is very useful for businesses looking to move away from managing hardware, no one else has an offering that comes close. Apple does the same thing in the consumer space and no one ever seems to care. Google's cloud is dogshit though, I've managed workspace tenants and it's so much worse than even Microsoft. Google's documentation is as likely to lie as to tell the truth, and their support is useless.

Or I can stay and express my views just like anyone else. You don't have to agree and no one needs to ban people they don't agree with, but their are plenty of people too fragile to handle that someone disagrees with them. Usually a keyboard totalitarian type. Thanks for weighing in though.

But she is welcome, she is very welcome. Outside of the two big cities in NE she pretty much gets all the votes.

Can honestly say I’ve never seen any of this with my leds. I did accidentally buy some that were too white, but that was my mistake.

Make it known that she will be unwelcome in your state and not voted for again. Even if this doesn't pass.. they'll try to pass a similar bill later.

​

I have "I vote for America" but when it comes to rights it's "I blew off my legs so I can break your encryption" Duckworth.

[removed]

But I like Emmentaler!

It's becoming increasingly clear that the US Government has a corruption problem.

Hmm.. nobody seems to care about that one..

Don't have my state.... don't have my state.... don't have my state

looks.....

Fucking Deb Fischer....

There is almost zero legitimate reason for the entire "fintech" space to exist at all.

First and second order financial service derivatives are acceptable, and add real utility/value to the economy - things like basic banking and lending services, properly regulated stocks/bonds, even options/futures trading to a lesser extent.

Past that, it's pretty much just corporations leeching money from the real economy, producing nothing of value and creating mass systemic risks. It's the same kind of shit that gave us the 2008 crisis.

The worst part is that the same kinds of people who push fintech have successfully convinced a ton of people to get mad at the wrong targets, and to support the worst form of fintech yet (cryptocurrencies).

They replaced our old bulbs with LED bulbs. Initially they were okay, though cooler than I'd like. Over a few months, they slowly turned purple due to a defect. From our living room, it almost looked like we had a neon sign on our front porch. Called the city to replace them.

There are some laws, but given the relatively young age of the tech, regulations haven’t caught up and it is a hard topic to broach.

If someone tricks you into giving them money, right now there isn’t a way to really do much because you pushed the send button. And should there be? This is part of the question.

One way to reduce this is to make it harder to join these types of P2P payment platforms and put other authentication and authorization “road blocks” in place. How many need to go on to strike a balance between security and keeping the service relevant? That’s yet to be seen.

Was gonna say, given the existence of sophisticated AIs and robots in Fallout juxtaposed with old school terminal design, it gives serious Fallout vibes.

[removed]