Recent comments in /f/technology
CrelbowMannschaft t1_jebtvua wrote
KhellianTrelnora t1_jebtqa9 wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Yay. So much for longing for the peace that only death can bring. I get to work forever!
smurficus103 t1_jebt3h9 wrote
Reply to comment by Dwarfdeaths in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
Wow, yeah, that does seem to solve the "old money" conundrum without bloodshed, if you expand the definition of land into all sufficently old property and charge a property tax on even, say, automation systems. A productivity tax? Sounds bizarre, but, also the opposite of a regressive tax.
/s, If only there were a way to itemize taxes,
Production taxes could go toward developing small buisness, little guys and gals getting out of h.s., for example
I had a similar thought that nobody cared for: as companies "write off" old equipment, they could choose to donate it for an additional write off & it gets lottoried to the public. Hopefully, this could encourage competitors to emerge from their backyard, or something. "Honey, i won a silicon furnace!"
[deleted] t1_jebt1er wrote
Reply to comment by sirhackenslash in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
[deleted]
BlogeOb t1_jebt16f wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Subscription inc
ParadigmCG t1_jebsb92 wrote
Reply to comment by grue2000 in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Now we're thinking rich
sassydodo t1_jebs78j wrote
Reply to A top AI researcher reportedly left Google for OpenAI after sharing concerns the company was training Bard on ChatGPT data by jack_lafouine
Something tells me it's not chatgpt data, it's just very large dataset and it just so happens that we as humanity aren't having some other alternative data
Same as saying that someone who builds wind turbines had built his turbines on other company's wind
BrokeAnimeAddict t1_jebs3ix wrote
Can we get less stuff posted behind pay walls?
red286 t1_jebrkm7 wrote
Reply to comment by Horat1us_UA in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
Most banks that get bailed out didn't break any laws. The problem isn't the banks, the problem is the lack of laws stopping banks from gambling with their clients' money. So long as it's not illegal, banks are going to keep doing it, and every time they do, the government in power makes it illegal to do it again, and then the government that follows undoes those regulations, meaning that every ~10 years there's a financial crisis that could have been averted if the regulations that had been put in place last time hadn't been repealed.
grue2000 t1_jebrg36 wrote
Reply to comment by ParadigmCG in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Infinite indentured servitude.
hngovr t1_jebr6nw wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
This will totally fix the environment
red286 t1_jebr31i wrote
Reply to comment by bake_disaster in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
Of course, everyone in FinTech will tell you that the reason those regulations exist is because the government doesn't want you to be successful.
outphase84 t1_jebr2i9 wrote
Reply to comment by Atilim87 in ‘Microsoft has a very anti-competitive posture in cloud,’ accuses Google by marketrent
Office365 is one such example. Pre installed on Azure VD, cannot be installed on Google VD or Amazon Workspaces.
Atilim87 t1_jebqxof wrote
Reply to comment by outphase84 in ‘Microsoft has a very anti-competitive posture in cloud,’ accuses Google by marketrent
When you write “in some cases” you just do the same thing as this article, making it really vague. N
Throwaway08080909070 t1_jebqkco wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
I can see why he's a former Google scientist.
ParadigmCG t1_jebqg31 wrote
Reply to comment by sirhackenslash in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Nah, you're thinking too poor.
We'll be able to get it, we have infinite time to repay the loan*
* The loan will be large enough that you'll never pay it down due to interest and if you get upset your recurring treatments will no longer get loans.
albanywairoa t1_jebqfhz wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
I don’t need immortality. For what?
outphase84 t1_jebqdwc wrote
Reply to comment by Atilim87 in ‘Microsoft has a very anti-competitive posture in cloud,’ accuses Google by marketrent
Microsoft gives advantageous licensing terms to their products if you’re on Azure, and in some cases outright blocks you from using their products on a competing cloud provider.
first__citizen t1_jebqasa wrote
Reply to comment by TbonerT in Microsoft still doesn't know what to do with its messaging apps. Just look at Skype and Teams. by redhatGizmo
It’s ok, they will embed chatGPT and all problems will be solved
whatistheformat t1_jebqadz wrote
Reply to comment by sirhackenslash in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
and the beautiful people they want to screw
gurenkagurenda t1_jebq66o wrote
Reply to comment by ghostinshell000 in A top AI researcher reportedly left Google for OpenAI after sharing concerns the company was training Bard on ChatGPT data by jack_lafouine
The research did, which is a bit different. I don't see why this would be a violation of the TOS though. I don't see anything in there about using model outputs to train other models. The closest would be:
> reverse assemble, reverse compile, decompile, translate or otherwise attempt to discover the source code or underlying components of models, algorithms, and systems of the Services
But that's not the same thing. Training your own model on ChatGPT outputs won't result in anything like the same source code, algorithms, or model weights as ChatGPT.
[deleted] t1_jebpuxv wrote
ParadigmCG t1_jebpi8j wrote
Reply to comment by mrstubali in AR Brings Dungeons & Dragons To Life IRL by John_Parlet
I've been playing d&d for like 23 years and this looks super cool idk what you're trying to say.
The new tech doesn't look perfect?
ghostinshell000 t1_jebtxlv wrote
Reply to comment by gurenkagurenda in A top AI researcher reportedly left Google for OpenAI after sharing concerns the company was training Bard on ChatGPT data by jack_lafouine
pretty much and alot of the Open source models have opensource like licenses on them.