Recent comments in /f/technology
zenithfury t1_jecayll wrote
Nooooo really? And I thought we were deregulating financial sectors because they are such paragons of virtue and laws only cramp their style.
wonderfulworld99 t1_jecak93 wrote
Reply to Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
Firewall? Not even the most despotic tyranny have had such power as the one the government will get with this bill. Bye bye all freedoms.
[deleted] t1_jecadqw wrote
Reply to comment by ersatzgiraffe in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
-
He doesn’t work at Google anymore
-
He's 75 years old best-selling author
-
He has made nearly 150 predictions in the last decades and roughly 86% of them became true, becoming an institution of futurology.
-
You didn't read the article.
> there are people [...] that don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about, perhaps.
Exactly. Exactly.
pobody-snerfect OP t1_jec9wum wrote
Reply to comment by m4c_4ddr3ss in Swiss solar tech can be rolled out on railway tracks ‘like a carpet’ by pobody-snerfect
Who funds these terrible ideas.
Solar panels on hats. Gimme some finding please.
marketrent OP t1_jec9h38 wrote
Reply to comment by JayCroghan in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
FCA’s Matthew Long wrote last month that the U.K. regulator “continue to see poor financial crime controls in some payments and e-money firms.”
That same regulator just put Revolut on notice that the company may be in breach of rules that state: “All adverts and promotions for financial services must be fair, clear and not misleading.”
socokid t1_jec9dfy wrote
Reply to CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
> “It’s a good deal for companies who don’t want to deal with the backlash and consequences that come with layoffs but need to cut costs somewhere,” she explains.
LOL
"It's great that we make it so undesirable that people just quit, saving us from having to fire them, which is harrrd.
Now, back to wasting a couple of hours a day commuting away from your familyu, wearing out your car and wasting gas, just to sit in an office so you can Teams video your coworkers from your cube."
...
If you run a company like this, good luck! My company and my wife's companies hire from all over the country. Not only are the prospects much better (much wider talent pool), but the idea that we can't communicate in a virtual office in 2023 is so ridiculous I wouldn't even know where to start.
They'll just go back to having an office the size of a gas station for a 300 plus person organization.
[deleted] t1_jec9cx3 wrote
Reply to CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
[deleted]
MargretTatchersParty t1_jec8z7p wrote
Reply to comment by FrostyDog94 in Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
>Hickenlooper
Have you contacted him?
compugasm t1_jec8y7e wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Hmm, have you ever seen someone who's 120 years old? They look like mummies.
[deleted] t1_jec8c0r wrote
[deleted] t1_jec81a8 wrote
Reply to comment by MenWhoStareAtBoats in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
[deleted]
ElysiumSprouts t1_jec7yu8 wrote
Reply to comment by cartsucks in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
>propaganda from corporate real estate companies
Nailed it! There's office space that needs renting!
[deleted] t1_jec7xb9 wrote
Reply to CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
[removed]
richardkay919 t1_jec7uck wrote
Reply to comment by mrstubali in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Plant immortality.
ElysiumSprouts t1_jec7sho wrote
Reply to CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
The thing is, despite the big name tech companies right- sizing their workforce, the tech industry is still booming. Remote work is an important employment perk for many people and there are still plenty of places that offer it.
KnackBrewster t1_jec7owg wrote
Reply to Microsoft still doesn't know what to do with its messaging apps. Just look at Skype and Teams. by redhatGizmo
They’re awful. I’d rather AOL windows all over the place.
HanaBothWays t1_jec7g7g wrote
Reply to comment by ChibiSailorMercury in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
It does take some effort but you can develop new hire onboarding, training, and mentorship programs that work in a remote setting and/or where everyone isn’t co-located. You have to have a checklist with timelines and specific things to fill out. My company did it.
MammothJust4541 t1_jec7eox wrote
Reply to Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of data collection by OutlandishnessOk2452
Data collection should be an opt in option instead of an opt out option.
Responsible_Hawk8015 t1_jec79mr wrote
Reply to Google denies Bard was trained with ChatGPT data — The Information published a report Wednesday including allegations from a former Google AI researcher that the company used a rival’s responses to train its own chatbot. Google denies that Bard uses that data by marketrent
I think google uses chatGPT, but honestly, they have so much data to train on I dont believe its necessary
MammothJust4541 t1_jec7026 wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Right around the same time Trump will go to jail for his crimes and nazis will stop hating jews.
FrostyDog94 t1_jec6m8c wrote
Reply to comment by MargretTatchersParty in Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
Damnit Hickenlooper...
ColinDare2000 t1_jec6loz wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Sure, this is some Elon Musk level shit/nonsense.
DaemonAnts t1_jec6i4d wrote
Reply to Google denies Bard was trained with ChatGPT data — The Information published a report Wednesday including allegations from a former Google AI researcher that the company used a rival’s responses to train its own chatbot. Google denies that Bard uses that data by marketrent
Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony.
incred_ble t1_jec6fso wrote
Reply to Twitter announces new API pricing, posing a challenge for small developers by rookie-mistake
The verification mark and API is priced. What is next? Tweeting? ACCESSING TWITTER??
AltCtrlShifty t1_jecb0in wrote
Reply to comment by I_might_be_weasel in A group of college students are sending a rover the size of a shoebox to the moon by speckz
Oxygen hopefully. And iPhones.