Recent comments in /f/technology
MargretTatchersParty t1_jectkrq wrote
Reply to comment by eveningsand in Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
Yep. Have you contacted your senators yet?
Lemonio t1_jectj5y wrote
Reply to comment by VelveteenAmbush in A top AI researcher reportedly left Google for OpenAI after sharing concerns the company was training Bard on ChatGPT data by jack_lafouine
It’s interesting because ChatGPT trained their models on data of companies they will now be competing with
[deleted] t1_jecthax wrote
Reply to comment by lanahci in Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
[deleted]
OG_Tater t1_jectbf7 wrote
Reply to comment by 08148692 in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
If everyone’s lifespan was infinite then money would adjust to that.
tinwhistler t1_ject7tq wrote
Reply to comment by Staple_Sauce in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
I usually get several recruiter emails a day. If I see the words "onsite" or "hybrid" anywhere in the email at first glance, I hit delete and don't even bother looking at what they're offering.
ethereal3xp OP t1_ject4od wrote
Reply to comment by 3vi1 in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
>"Work in the office" is just the manager's way of saying they don't understand what you do and have no way to measure your output unless they can constantly look over at your desk and make sure you're not happy.
This is sad if true.... get happy off the misery of others
Thats really...
ztpurcell t1_ject0c0 wrote
Reply to Midjourney ends free trials of its AI image generator due to 'extraordinary' abuse by hugglenugget
Is it really extraordinary though? Have they seen the internet?
Flyfly-2022 t1_jecsydc wrote
Reply to comment by cartsucks in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
So true. They’re pushing it so hard because they all have money in commercial mortgage backed securities and they lose control over employees’ time which gives them opportunity to shop around for better deals.
Dwarfdeaths t1_jecsnrs wrote
Reply to comment by lzwzli in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
(1) Property tax considers both land and land improvements, e.g. a house or factory. Taxing the house disincentivizes construction and investment on land, which is exactly the opposite of what we want. The land value tax only attempts to capture rent, which is an intrinsic value associated with the productivity of the location compared to alternatives. Actual studies of this policy have been done and LVT encourages construction when used to displace property taxes.
(2) A tax on the market value of the land (or property) can never capture the full ground rent. This is because the market value of land derives from the rent you could collect from it (or the work you could do on it yourself). The market value of the land will decrease, adjusting for the lost tax revenue, and that in turn changes the amount of tax that will be collected...
Let's call "Rev" the annual tax revenue, "Rate" the annual tax rate on land value, "Rent" the true ground rent, and "t" the number of years someone considers in their assessment of market value of real estate.
Rev = (market_value)*Rate
Rev = (Rent*t - Rev*t)*Rate
Rev = Rent * t*Rate/(1 + t*Rate)
No matter what combination of t and Rate you choose, the tax revenue will always be smaller than ground rent. Moreover, the higher you try to set the tax rate, the more unstable the assessment will get, because you're trying to charge large multiples of tiny appraisal values. Instead you have to assess the ground rent directly.
[deleted] t1_jecs9pe wrote
Reply to comment by ethereal3xp in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
[removed]
THAZACHARIAH t1_jecrk4q wrote
Reply to comment by WoolyLawnsChi in A group of college students are sending a rover the size of a shoebox to the moon by speckz
This is actually the second honeymooner’s reference ive scrolled through today
TreeHawkFeather t1_jecrinn wrote
Reply to CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
If anyone needed more evidence about how your media is controlled.
[deleted] t1_jecrfzg wrote
hw_convo t1_jecr4ol wrote
Reply to comment by WaitingForNormal in Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
Yeah it does sound a lot like overreach
ethereal3xp OP t1_jecqpme wrote
Reply to comment by nadine258 in CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
>. I went in this week and I was one of four people. And I was on teams calls all day.
Does this make sense?
This can't be real life...
WoolyLawnsChi t1_jecqh82 wrote
Reply to Here’s What Happened When ChatGPT Wrote to Elected Politicians - Cornell researchers used artificial intelligence to write advocacy emails to state legislators. The responses don’t bode well for democracy in the age of A.I. by speckz
LOL
Legislators will have to talk to constituents and have town halls again
The horror
and don’t give me the lobbying/astroturf ”nightmare” arguement
thanks to billionaires, that ship sailed years ago
Praesumo t1_jecq9ni wrote
Lol, this will be about as effective as anti-monopoly laws have been...and that is NOT AT ALL.
[deleted] t1_jecq33h wrote
Reply to Aptera’s Solar-Powered EV Is Finally Finished—and It Looks Just as Bonkers as the Concept by elister
I still can’t believe they advertise this as an off-road adventure rig, I always see ads for it with the comments locked because they can’t handle the criticism. This thing is going to crack at the first pot hole.
lzwzli t1_jecpr2s wrote
Reply to comment by Dwarfdeaths in It's becoming increasingly clear that fintech has a fraud problem by marketrent
I don't get it. We already have property tax. If you fail to pay property tax, the government can reposes the land and sell it to someone else who can pay. How is what you're proposing different?
thetimsterr t1_jecpqsr wrote
Then they can fuck right off. No one is forcing them take the free money we're handing out.
Mutex70 t1_jecplp3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
And how was that 86% number determined? Oh right, that was his own interpretation of how many predictions he had gotten right.
The guy is like a tech version of a psychic. He makes money by promising unrealistic bullshit without a shred of evidence.
Patient_Commentary t1_jecpdu9 wrote
Reply to comment by ShawnyMcKnight in Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
CA.. not on the list. Phew.
Mutex70 t1_jecpcah wrote
Reply to immortality: Humans will attain immortality with the help of 'nanobots' by 2030, claims former Google scientist by Vailhem
Ray Kurzweil regularly makes incorrect predictions, then goes on to argue that they were "essentially correct", even though they weren't:
lanahci t1_jecp0dp wrote
Reply to Senator Warner’s RESTRICT Act Is Designed To Create The Great Firewall Of America by vriska1
Was bound to happen. If not now, then by the time we end up at war with China.
spisHjerner t1_jectv71 wrote
Reply to CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
We've purchased all these buildings with borrowed money. We need X% of you to occupy them, or else we have to sell them.
Sell them.