Recent comments in /f/washingtondc

Hope_Burns_Bright t1_jeazqtc wrote

Let's pretend that you're not a throwaway account with the sole purpose of being a contrarian troll on this subreddit.

For fucks sake it says "after some violent attacks in the area" without any attribution. What does "in the area" mean? Are the attacks random or targeted? Did they result in arrest? Just admit you don't want any of that data because you're satisfied with a couple of Lone Rangers shooting "undesirable" people in the street, Karen.

Goddamn, your addiction to Nextdoor has obliterated all literacy skills you may have had.

But sure, off-duty cops with less oversight than they already had will solve this! All the better to get those scary people who stand around on the sidewalk. Hey, got any spare boots I can lick? You seem like the expert.

−6

DancesWithTreetops OP t1_jeayoef wrote

Using outside counsel to conduct an investigation makes a ton of sense. I have no issue with that at all. Additionally, I have no problem with the people who conducted the investigation. The person who headed up the investigation is VERY good at his job, ethical as hell, and a verifiable truth teller. But, there is no denying that the results are much easier to cover up when the investigators firm is being paid by the employer of the investigated. They can do whatever they want with the results of that investigation. Which sucks.

15