AbsentEmpire

AbsentEmpire t1_iy07k4l wrote

>The expansion of large medical systems into suburban areas steers patients into these larger systems, eliminating competition with smaller health care organizations. Without that competition, costs will increase, critics maintain.

Its a complex situation but the reality is that healthcare centralization has been underway for almost two decades now.

The smaller suburban systems have been going bankrupt for years. The rural systems have almost completely ceased to exist.

Many of them have been bought up by private for profit systems, which is really just the acceleration of the death spiral for a health system before its closed and sold off.

The expansion of large medical systems with outpatient services that funnel patients into thier central hospitals for advanced procedures, is really the only way that many suburbs are going have health systems at all in the future, as smaller ones continue to be unable to cover costs.

The idea that a free market exists in health care, and that price competition between hospitals is even a thing, is a conservative fever dream. It's never existed in practice.

23

AbsentEmpire t1_ixzvkka wrote

Bill Clinton wanted to gut social security and only got held up from doing so by the scandal.

Democrats are very frequently in lock step with Republicans when it comes to "entitlement reform", deregulation, and public private partnerships.

None of which changes the fact that neo-liberalism and end stage capitalism are two separate terms with actual definitions of which you used incorrectly.

Your original comment is talking about neo-liberalism, not end stage capitalism, those are two different things.

2

AbsentEmpire t1_ixzux6b wrote

Yep this is the fight that's occurring with Chester City trying to claim ownership of Chester Water Authority, despite its board being made up of repressives from Delco and Chester counties, which is where the majority of the CWA customers are.

Hopefully the CWA prevails in its fight and remains a municipal water system. It's one of the oldest and best run water authorities in the Northeast.

5

AbsentEmpire t1_ixzug4u wrote

Yep this is the problem entirely. Residents fight paying for the actual costs to maintain and run municipal services for decades, because they don't understand the concept of long-term maintenance and liability costs.

The system gets neglected to the point of failure, and local leaders being unable to raise the now massive amount of money to fix all the deferred maintenance, sell it off to private companies who have zero qualms with increasing people's bills to pay for the services and cover the cost of all that back due maintenance.

3

AbsentEmpire t1_ixzg3ib wrote

Townships sell off their municipal utilities usually because they need expensive maintenance, or the township needs money for maintenance on something else, typically roads, or unfunded liabilities coming due.

Residents will fight against any small fractional increase in taxes or rates to pay for this maintenance, which usually has been deferred for years and can no longer be ignored; because the concept that things cost money to fix and maintain, even for the government, is a concept your average person just can't handle.

Pressed between a rock and a hard spot for money, townships do the only thing they can besides raise rates/taxes, which is sell off assets.

Residents ultimately end up paying more over time for this because companies like Aqua have a profit motive and will charge the real cost of the system, plus an additional amount to make a profit.

The cost difference for residents between municipal utilities and private ones can be extreme.

Philadelphia bills by the month and combined water and sewer costs for an average household using 500 cubic feet of water are $74, and that's with two rate hikes over the last two years. It would be even cheaper if there weren't so many people in Philly who didn't pay thier bills.

Chester Water Authority is even cheaper, they bill by quarter and thier typical bill is just under $100 which averages out to $33 a month.

Privatized utilities can easily be double the costs of municipal systems, this a well known and observed situation.

24

AbsentEmpire t1_ixnkzkh wrote

It just is, it's a necessary part of PA forest management.

The PA Game Commission has strict rules on hunting. They tightly regulate how many animals of what types and when, that can be harvest by hunters. They also require reporting by hunters of what they took and where.

They won't allow the animal populations to fall into endangered status, and use hunters for effective animal population control.

If anything this is a good thing because it indicates the PA black bear population is healthy.

118